Nobrainer’s Think Tank

I just learned about a new “surprisingly simple” way to fight cancer:

When we diagnose cancer, the treatment is still primarily surgical, commonly combined with radiation therapy and anticancer drugs. The aim of these treatments is to suppress, or arrest, the unrestrained growth of cells in the body organs or tissues. In the case of many man-made systems we are similarly faced with situations where processes deviate from the normal operation of the system. But the remedy for such deviations is surprisingly simple: negative feedback.

Hmm, feedback. I do hate cancer and I do love modern control theory! Tell me more!

Negative feedback means that the system’s output is fed back into the same system in order to enable the system to determine the difference between the actual and the desired output, and to make the necessary corrections in its own operation. For example a vehicle’s speed control uses the difference between the actual and the desired speed to adjust the fuel flow rate. Those systems which feed back their own output for self-regulation are said to be closed-loop control systems.

Yup, I get that. I use the cruise control all the time. (more…)

In today’s NYT business section, Tyler Cowen writes why reducing the middlemen from health care won’t make it a “free lunch.” The basic point is that lower overhead costs are generally created by shifting the costs to health care consumers, generally in the forms of either fewer available treatment options, or longer waiting times for treatment.

This is not groundbreaking, but it reminds me of some information from an EconTalk podcast with Richard Epstein. From the time starting at 33:58:

“Often Times, the sale of drugs goes down in absolute units when they become generic… but what happens is, if you don’t have a brand name, it’s harder to sell it. And if there are 11 guys making it, nobody wants to advertise it. So that the thing tends to disappear from consciousness… Ironically, one of the things you could argue respectably now is that lengthening the patent term will actually help consumers in addition to producers by making sure that somebody’s keeping that drug in everybody’s face.”

The basic economic analysis predicts the presence of generics will dramatically shift the supply curve which seems to predict an increase in quantity of drugs at reduced prices. But the lack of advertising pushes the demand curve even further in the opposite direction. This seems to indicate a dramatic monetary savings at the cost of fewer people getting the drugs they want or need.

I’ve said it. You’ve said it. Our mothers have said it. Our fathers have said it. Our fathers’ brothers’ cousins’ nephews’ former roommates have said. And it’s stupid. There shouldn’t be a law.

Why? Because people who make laws say that. They believe it. Then they make a law. It’s usually a stupid law.

For example, mandating child car seats. They’re expensive, bulky, and not necessarily a major safety improvement. And they’re often misused. From an article in the St. Paul Pioneer Press:

The Minnesota Safety Council estimates more than 80 percent of child car seats used in Minnesota are not properly installed.

I was just about mention that Freakonomics talked about car seats and their worthlessness a bit. So I just went to their blog to search for any content they had about car seats. Well “search” turned into the 2nd visible post on their blog today. Consumer Reports recently found:

When we crash-tested infant car seats at the higher speeds vehicles routinely withstand, most failed disastrously. The car seats twisted violently or flew off their bases, in one case hurling a test dummy 30 feet across the lab.

CONGRATULATIONS! You just spent your money on a government mandated piece of shit! But remember, car seats are for “the greater good” and “for the children” and “for the future.”

But there was another article that caught my attention today. In part it was because a drunk crashed his truck and collapsed a whole bridge. But as I read it commented on his BAC.

A preliminary breath test at the crash site showed Campbell’s blood-alcohol content at .21, nearly three times the legal limit of .08. He blew .13 after completing field sobriety tests and a Datamaster test showed .147.

Hows that for accuracy and precision! Do the police use the average? The min? The max? The median? The mode? The average was .162 with a standard deviation of .042… or about 25% of the average. Hey, it’s close enough for government work!

And I almost forgot to rant about other stupid legislation, such as nutrition labels and movie, tv, and video game ratings. What has this information done? Made us fatter and focus on adult, R-rated, and most extreme video games. FUCK YEAH!

But I never lit myself on fire…

nor other people.

Hooray for scientific breakthroughs!

Where do I sign up and what’s the down-payment?

And is there some kind of recycling or trade-in program to get rid of the old one?

I think I’ll go for the Antartic Blue Super Sports model with C.B. and optional rally fun pack as opposed to the higher capacity Metallic Pea Family Truckster.*

Nice.

“In fact, the National Academy of Science’s Institute of Medicine estimates that 18,000 Americans die each year because they have no health insurance.” [Some guy from Ohio for whom I'd rather die by lack of insurance than vote for]

And more importantly, why should I care?