I said I’d test it, and I’ve finally gotten my chance. I’ve got about 290 miles of interstate to cover en route to Huntersville, NC. The game plan is simple. I’ll stop at a local hardware store, pick up some “pure” acetone, then head to the gas station where I will top off the tank of my test vehicle, a ‘95 Grand Prix with ~120,000 miles and some body damage, with gasoline and about 4.8 fluid ounces of acetone. The tank is about 16.5 gallons, so that should give me a ratio of about 3 ounces per 10 gallons, which is ideal according to Louis LaPointe. Once I get to Huntersville, I will top off again. Hopefully I will get receipts to verify my location, time, speed, and distance traveled.
Typically my mileage is about 27-28 mpg on the interstate. I’ll be mildly impressed by anything greater than 30. Of course if acetone is as good as is claimed, then I should get an easy 35 mpg.
On my way home, there should be between 1.5 and 2.3 fl. oz. of acetone left in my tank. That means that my trip home will provide a nice little secondary test.
I’ve written the above at about 3 PM on April 19th, 2007. I hope to be at the hardware store around 4PM and to leave the gas station by 4:45 PM. This should be achievable. [Note: I am not publishing my plan ahead of time because I really don’t want to announce that I’m not going to be at my house all weekend.]
THE RESULTS:
I went to Lowe’s, got some acetone and a 1 gallon gas can (for easy mixing) and went to the gas station. There I realized that the acetone can had a lid that had to be pried off. And my test plan changed.
The new plan: stop for gas every ~95 miles. Do two segments without acetone to determine a bit of a baseline, then add it and run with it for the rest of the trip. For every segment, record mileage, average speed, and gas usage.
| Acetone content (oz per 10gal)** | miles | gallons | mileage | average speed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 92.9 | 3.197 | 29.1 | 70 |
| 0 | 96.3 | 3.456* | 27.9 | 70 |
| 3.1 | 96.2 | 2.9516 | 32.6 | 71 |
| 2.6 | 104.9 | 3.355 | 31.3 | 72 |
| 2.0 | 85.9 | 2.385 | 36.0 | 72 |
| 1.7 | 92.8 | 2.932 | 31.7 | 70 |
* Gas volume + acetone added
** Initially I posted the wrong values, instead I had posted (0,0,2.6,2.0,1.7,1.4).
Much to my surprise, my mileage definitely improved after I added the acetone. The net effect, based on this data (28.4 mpg pre-acetone & 32.7 mpg with acetone), is an increase of about 15%. The most significant result here is my mileage getting over 30 mpg for an extended time. I am not willing to say with confidence that 15% was the true improvement; I reckon it could be between about 9 and 18%. Nor am I ready to say that acetone works as advertised. However, I will say that it definitely appears there was good improvement due to the acetone. There is room for further investigation. In particular, I want to test without acetone ASAP (even though I pretty much can’t), to see if the improvement stays or disappears.
Notes: There were a number of variables which weren’t controlled for. For example, the weather for the first half the trip was cool and very rainy. The other half was warm and sunny. Of course traffic was also not constant. There were several brands of gas. There were several pumps and no guarantee they all operate the same. Plus the legs aren’t equal. There are probably other variables.
UPDATE 6/4/2007:
Over the last few days, I went on a road trip that took me from Charlottesville to Huntersville, beyond, and back. I covered the same miles and stopped at most of the same gas stations. This time the weather going out was warm and clear, while the weather coming back was rainy and cool. Additionally, the car also had to deal with extra weight and moderate (compared to virtually zero the first trip). The weather and heavier traffic led to some stop-and-go driving on the way back, as well as overall slower average speeds. This time, there was no acetone added to the tank, although there should be some residual acetone leftover from the last test. That amount should be quite low, less than 0.07oz/10gal of gasoline.
The mileage comparisons are interesting, but I honestly am not sure of the best way to compare the new data to the old data.
The mileage per segment was 27.93, 26.83, 34.65, 24.95, 33.61, 29.56.
The mileage per segment compared to the first test was -1.13, -1.04, +1.72, -6.02, -2.40, -2.09. Basically, five out of six segments were worse than before.
In the first test, the first two legs had gas with no acetone. Comparing those first two legs, the mileage dropped from 28.44 to 27.35, or about 4%. For the last 4 legs, the mileage dropped from 32.67 to 30.20, or about 8%.
In calculating the results for the first test, I compared the average mileage of the last 4 segments with the average mileage of the first 2. That seemed to show about a 15% improvement. Doing the same for the latest test shows a 10% improvement.
So by this data, the acetone may have accounted for an 8% improvement. It’s not shabby, but it is nowhere near the 30 or 35 percent that some people claim to find. And even that 8% is questionable. On the second trip the car carried more weight, which should reduce mileage anyway. But I went slower which should increase mileage. Although it wasn’t a constant average because it included some stops due to wrecks. And the trip out was in May and the trip back was in June. June 1st is the day to switch to summer blend gasoline. So there may have been more ethanol in the tank on the way back which could also have reduced mileage.
The most important thing that can be taken from this is how hard it is to accurately measure the change caused by a variation of just one of the many factors that affect fuel mileage. There are just too many uncontrollable factors involved in road-testing to be definitive.
I’m working on updates to this data. Last night I drove a virtually identical Charlottesville to Huntersville trip. This includes stopping at 3 of the 4 gas stations (the first 3) used before… and I believe I even used the same pumps.
For the first leg: 27.93mpg.
2nd leg: 26.83 mpg
3rd leg: 34.65 mpg
More to follow.
I seriously question your ability to calculate your gas mileage when you are only partially filling the tank.
Were you just trusting the accuracy of your gas gage to tell you when you’re tank was empty?
Let’s look at your best leg:
Miles Gals Mileage
85.9 2.385 36.0
If you miscalculated your gas usage by only 1/4th a gallon which would have been very easy for you to do, your mileage could have actually been:
Miles Gals Mileage
85.9 2.635 32.5
Off by 1/2 a gallon?
Miles Gals Mileage
85.9 2.885 29.7
1 - I was using a full tank.
2 - I said “There were several pumps and no guarantee they all operate the same.” Which means they could be off by various fractions of a gallon.
Thanks for the clarification on that point.
I don’t think you are going to get a lot of variability based on the accuracy of various pumps. I believe your variability is going to come from the shut off mechanism on the pumps. Even though you may think you are “topping” off your tank, there could easily be a variability of +/- a quarter of a gallon between different pumps when they shut off.
If you are measuring your gas mileage by emptying an entire tank of fuel and refilling it, that variability isn’t going to make a big difference on your overall MPG calculation. In your case where you are only burning a few gallons of fuel and then topping off, this becomes a big factor.
Thanks for posting all the articles about acetone and gasoline. I’ve enjoyed reading them all.
I have been a tech for 20 years on auto and heavy off road equip, this is just bull shit. FACT
I go to the SAME gas station every time.
I top off the tank in EXACTLY the same manner every time.
I have verified through many many visits to the station and the usage of different pumps at this same station that the pump shut-off mechanisms can vary up to 1 GALLON (±0.5 gallon) from one pump to the next!!!
This makes all the “top-off” experiments completely invalid.
1) ALWAYS use the same pump
2) ALWAYS empty the tank before filling up to reduce variability
If you follow the above procedure, you can compare mileage with minimal error (probably ±2% or so). Otherwise you are just pissing in the wind.
I have ran 5 consecutive test using Acetone in my 2002 Avalanche and I still get an average of 15.89 mpg. I have sent Nobrainer an e-mail with no response.
I can’t fathom why you sent me an email. But I most assuredly did not receive it.
The reason I sent you an e-mail is because you put out this report and as my entry on May 7th states, Acetone does not increase fuel millage like you state. My questions is what could be the reason why? Also the last test I ran with Acetone, I got 13.89 mpg. I normally average between 13.8 city and 15.8 highway, with or without Acetone. Do you have a better address to contact you?
My conclusion was that my tests were far from definitive. If you read some of my other commentary on the matter, you’ll find that I highly skeptical that acetone really improves mileage. So, to answer your first question, I think there are 2 possible reasons. First it could be acetone just doesn’t work. Or it could be that acetone works and your test stinks (I say this not to be insulting, as I would classify my own test as a stinker).
As for a better email address, the one listed should work just fine. However, if you have thoughtful, insightful, funny, or otherwise amusing commentary or questions, I’d prefer that you go ahead and post them here.
Wow! guy just tests acetone with gas and everyone is like “your wrong!, let me send you an email”! Maybe it does work, maybe it does not. I pat the guy on the back for trying. Theres people who follow and people who strive for change, LEADERS! Go ahead and post with your, ” i got 20+ years of exp. crap”! “this is a fact”. Whatever! And you keep paying your $4.00 for 1 gal of gas!
The fact that you are conducting a test and are therefore very aware of your driving ( moreso than usual I suspect) could be the reason for the positive results as you are driving more carefully ( avoiding over braking, accelerating etc.) - just a thought. What about these hydrogen splitters kits that are appearing on the net to improve combustion? e.g. http://www.squidoo.com/gasfuel
I’m highly skeptical. Does adding hydrogen improve combustion and efficiency? Perhaps. To my knowledge, which is admittedly very limited, there isn’t any great evidence that gasoline/hydrogen mixtures are significantly more efficient than gasoline only mixtures. If the mixture is an improvement, one must then consider the amount of hydrogen necessary and the energy required to produce that hydrogen.
I’m glad to see you finally tried it. I, too, am going to give it a whirl. I have the luxury of having very close to a true 50/50 mix of highway and city driving in my daily commute, day in-day out for the last year. I live on the Gulf Coast, and the weather here is pretty constant for long stretches.
I was lucky enough to find a true “little old lady car”, a 1991 Civic LX sedan with 80K miles(!!) about a year ago. I’ve always used 87 octane gas, from a Kangaroo station that just opened up 3/4 mile from my house right before I bought the car. I have ALWAYS checked the mileage on every tank of fuel since I bought this car, running it to around 1/4 tank or so each time before fill-up. After the first two tanks of unimpressive mileage numbers (I’ve always owned big V-8 vehicles, and never cared about fuel mileage before), I figured out “how to drive” this car, and have gotten a very steady average of around 30 MPG. I had an out-of-the-ordinary highway trip recently, which netted a good average of 34.8. This was all highway, over a course of about 1100 miles round trip. On the trip, I had roughly the same weather/temps/winds.
I also go into this “experiment” with some predisposed notions (bias) in mind. I think that there are probably going to be two things at the heart of this. First, I think the solvent properties of pure acetone will probably do a wonderful cleaning job on my 16 year old injector/injectors (I do know it’s fuel injected, I just honestly don’t know whether it has one or two injectors). Second, I agree that there is almost no way to judge whether I am affecting the results of my own experiment. But given the maturity of my commute–with this car, with this gas station, with my already “corrected” driving style, etc., I would think that that part might be minimized? Another benefit (also due to its cleaning properties) is an expected increase in performance/idle quality, so I hope that doesn’t cause me to skew the results in an unexpected way.
I will try to keep you informed of my results. If I can get this thing to 35 MPG in my regular commute I’ll be ecstatic, regardless of which factor actually makes it happen! Especially considering that the EPA numbers for the car showed 26 MPG (old number) and 23 (revised number) for HIGHWAY mileage!! See www.fueleconomy.gov for their stuff. We’ll see what happens.

holy crap