Mythbusters finally tackled the issue and tested car performance with acetone mixed with gasoline. Was the mileage improvement touted by Louis Lapointe confirmed? Plausible? No. And no. Totally busted.
They didn’t test the full range of mixtures, but said they used about a 500:1 gasoline:acetone ratio. That’s about 2.56 fluid ounces per 10 gallons.

Just like the engineers at Kettering University, no improvement due to acetone was found. In fact, it looked as though mileage was decreased in all four of their scenarios (2 speeds times 2 cars) on the dyno.
I’m SHOCKED!
UPDATE: whoops! I thought tonight’s episode was new. I was wrong, according to Wikipedia it aired on May 10, 2006. And crazy ol’ LaPointe defends himself in his FAQ (seriously, read it and decide for yourself that the guy is nuts):
Did you know that MythBusters says acetone reduces mileage? I heard that. Of course it is false. The whole purpose of asking people to buy a ScanGauge is to find out the Truth for themselves. MythBusters created a myth rather than busted one. Perhaps they were paid to promote controversy with unscrupulous propaganda. Perhaps to create controversy to gain audience. But it looks like acetone was hurting somebody’s profits. Nobody pays me anything. I get my monthly SS and live off that, including what I spend on testing gasoline which is damned expensive. There are lots of things I could do with the money than waste it on a lie or keep searching for ways to improve mileage. Why do I do this? I do it for the public–for you folks, out of my good heart. The liars are not hurting me because I do not depend on them. They hurt the public with their unfounded and/or inaccurate opinions. Get a ScanGauge, people.
Is it possible MythBusters deliberately faked bad results with acetone? Possible for a simple reason. Their conclusion is out to lunch. This additive works in such tiny amounts that it could cost the industry billions in lost sales–keeping that money in your pockets. Here are just a few ways to rig a test for failure. Bad plug wires or bad spark plugs. Bad acetone with water or benzoate. Bad fuel mixture. Bad ignition timing and/or computer settings. An engine in poor condition. That is why I suggest you keep your engine and car in top condition when you test fuels with acetone, GP-7, neohexane or xylene. When I first started examining acetone for MPG back in the 50s, I found I could not depend on test results unless the engine was in excellent condition. Over the years I eventually found the parts that give best mileage. 50+ years of testing means I am a very stupid individual or lying like a rug to maintain this position on acetone and other mileage tips. Both my ScanGauges must be lying too. Be aware there are hundreds of people seriously testing fuels out there–who must be liars also. The Truth always comes out. Always. The method of testing I use is repeated over and over to avoid errors. I never test just once because gasoline changes. Everything changes. I guess I have tested acetone thousands of times by many different ways. I wonder if the same people who faked bad test results with acetone have also praised ethanol. Plus the good acetone comes from Klean-Strip or 100-percent pure from Sally Beauty Supply, that is worldwide.
Way back when I addressed this, I speculated that the guy was making money by selling ScanGuages, because half of his website is about buying one so you can do yourself the favor of testing your car.
Being credible shows up nowhere on the guy’s site. Like I said, his “data” exist on a level consistent with high schoolers and not with anyone with credible technical training. And he doesn’t bother to say something like “hey, buy any equipment you believe in and test for yourself.” It’s always ScanGuage ScanGuage ScanGuage!
The second paragraph from his FAQ is hilarious, too. Most of his defenders use really crapped out cars to test acetone before swearing that acetone works. Now he’s saying that your car must be in top working order for it to work. Keeping your car in top working order is the recommendation made by everyone who knows anything about cars. It’s also exactly what the oil and auto industries recommend (remember, according to LaPointe, these industries are doing everything they can to keep mileage down). But most of the people who would be into acetone are the people who do not want to spend money on repairs, upkeep, etc. (I also like how he capitalizes “truth.”)
Louis may be an honest guy, but if that’s the case he’s apparently a horrible scientist. Or he is a flat out liar. Either way, I find zero reason to believe the guy.
UPDATE 2 - 6/18/2007: LaPointe is right about one thing. Fuel mileage is highly variable and dependent upon conditions. So it is accurate to say “gasoline changes. Everything changes,” and that extensive testing must be done to verify something. And really, it should be done in the laboratory. If not done in the lab, the testing must start with an extensive testing of baseline conditions. That means, for the average driver, they must record months of mileage results and conditions to start with. Otherwise, without a solid baseline, any quantitative comparison is fairly useless. I venture to guess that the vast majority of people who report on their tests — myself included — have not sufficiently established a set of accurate baseline data.
To add to that, Chevron has had a very useful page about calculating mileage and what factors can affect your mileage and by how much. [Edit 2010-01-24: The Chevron page has been changed dramatically since I first linked to it, and is now much less useful.]
As an extra example, another episode of Mythbusters tested fuel mileage of a car at varying distances behind a semi. The results varied from about 32 mpg up to 44 mpg. Same car, same driver, same gas, same day, the distance behind the truck had a huge impact on mileage.
Links of interest:
- Engineers at Kettering University were unable to find increased mileage due to acetone..
- Acetone probably can’t improve the surface tension of gasoline.
- Oil companies make most acetone.
UPDATE 3 - 6/18/2008: Just a few thoughts/comments from my end:
- The above link to a Chevron page still works, but the page has changed significantly, which is a shame.
- If you’re going to leave a comment, try to be smart about it. This means that at least a little bit of proofreading is a good idea. It also means that if you’re going to post your results from your own testing, describe things like how you established your baseline and what your baseline was and then go forward in describing the with-acetone results. Honestly, I’m getting a little tired of the dreadfully stupid comments being left these days. They are so bad that I can’t tell if they’re supposed to be serious or funny.
I guess not that many people have ever heard of blind or double blind studies
Double-blind describes an especially stringent way of conducting an experiment, usually on human subjects, in an attempt to eliminate subjective bias.
(from wikipedia)
with that’s said, i beleive suggesting double-blind trials on machines means double-ignorant..
Double blind in this case would be that the driver does not know if he has acetone in his tank or not. Just thinking that you’re getting better mileage may affect how you drive. You may drive more cautiously and carefully so as to not blow your gain in mileage.
Duh!
Because humans are involved, they need a blind study to limit the effect of the driver.
In your description you said it was “usually used on humans”. Do we need to look up what usually means as well, or have you figured that out by now? Just because some thing is usually used on something doesn’t mean it can’t ever be used for something else. And, your not only testing the machine, like Mike said the way you drive has a lot to do about it. So what does that make you? Quadruple-ignorant???
Really John Doe?
Have you tried it yourself???
I have, for over a year now! And YES, Acetone increases milage! And my truck runs sooo much better !!!
You must work for Big Oil or the Gov.
Go crawl under a rock! It’s people like you that are destroying us and the planet.
Oh and Ryan… no I just see ALOT of Blind People!
Brutus
Is it just me, or do all the pro-acetone people use multiple punctuation marks?
Is it just me or is “no BRAIN er” a perfect name for you? You ask for comments from the public, but when they reply in a way that doesn’t agree with you, you ridicule them in such a childish way. Grow up my friend and let your knowledge grow by not always thinking you’re right, because it’s obvious you’re not.
At least show people the respect to have their own opinion.
Can’t believe people still fall for this stuff nowadays! Just like the resistor in your IAT sensor, O2 sensor compensates for the richness. No one has produced a study under ‘controlled’ conditions that produces these improvements, only studies that prove it’s in-effectiveness. Being a licsensed Automotive and Heavy Duty Diesel mechanic, I have seen these claims come and go, mechanical and chemical, with no definitive results. Here are 3 ways to increase your mileage, drive the speed limit, don’t sprint from stop to stop, maintain proper tire pressure….doing these 3 things can save you up to 30%……..without buying any chemicals, mechanical devices, or any major driving changes! There is no cure for stupid driving habits and poorly maintained vehicles!
for a mechanic you know very little about increasing mileage
Actually he knows quite a bit. That is precisely the results that I witnessed in my 2003 Saturn Vue. Try to keep your RPM under 2000 when accelerating for a full tank of gas. Also, try to use your brakes as little as possible. This means you need to predict when you are going to stop, and try to coast to a stop instead of wasting your kinetic energy. You might be surprised at the results.
Look up hypermiling sometime.
But if it really worked how come places like Japan and Europe dont do it? Is the whole world controlled by OPEC? I thought freedom countries want to fight OPEC the oil whores. Seriously if it had a significant gain I think most scientists will be raising hell on the government.
Testing Octane for more than 20 years, have no doubt saying that actually Acetone DOES increase the “RESEARCH OCTANE” number,(Octane Laboratory tested) one of two octane testing criteria used to calculate the octane rating of any given fuel.
And don’t be fooled with those tablet additives since they just dont work.
Although, Acetone should be of very good quality with moisture contents < 1.0% or <10,000 ppm to avoid moisture damage to the engine.
Can also help test octane number if need to for this study.
Looks like “Brutus” sprung his devastating logic trap a day too early - today’s the Ides of March, not yesterday. Yesterday was Pi Day. Duh.
I just started experimenting with 100% acetone in my dodge truck. I bought the “100% actetone” at a drug store however, it has benzoate in it. Most of the literature I have read states that benzoate is bad for combustion, however, most of the acetones I have looked at have benzoate in it? Any suggestions?
Just as mentioned above… Klean Strip 100% (Or as close as chemically possible) Walmart, Lowes, Home Depot.
The nay-sayers are nuts!!!!!!!!!!! I have consistently been getting better gas mileage in my 1998 Saturn SL2 while using 100% pure acetone. I avg about 240 miles to 10 gallons of gasoline without acetone, and can rack up a little over 300 miles on 10 gallons with acetone added. (Both numbers are a combination of hwy/city, plus me beating the crap out of it.) Say what you want, but I’ll continue average over 30 miles per gallon.
I recently started using acetone, but not after establishing a baseline MPG a month prior. Now it is a month after using acetone. My non-acetone MPG was 12.83. My new MPG is 14.86. I will continue to collect data before I really jump on the band wagon, especially with the transition from winter to spring driving conditions.
But I do have to agree about LaPointe. He doesn’t come off as being totally credible or scientific. I emailed him what I thought was a supportive letter suggesting more hard data to improve his credibility. I got back a speech about me being a nut case and just inflating my own ego, plus the usual speech about how he doesn’t get one cent for his research (wrong!!).
He was totally unprofessinal and certainly didn’t react like someone who is truly knowledgeable or scientific or only caring for his cause. I might think this one of the biggest scams around except for the fact that I know acetone worked for me. And maybe that is it. The acetone does seem to work but do the devices he recommends (or sells?? via a hidden partnership) really work all on their own?? So far not enough credible evidence for me.
I tried using 100% acetone in my gas, and after 5 months, my fuel lines started to swell up. I only used 2.5 ounces in my 15 gallon tank. Definately not worth it.
My dad used to make racing fuel for our go karts back in the late 50’s . I remember well, his beakers and cans and jars of nitro-methane, acetone, benzene and Sunoco “blue”….if my memory serves me correct, the diaphragms in the Tillotson carbs and fuel lines never swelled.But our eyes did burn from the fumes…….
Did he by any chance get cancer?
A lot of unexplained deaths, due to cancer, are due to people unwittingly inhaling VOC’s. Those poor nail technicians have babies with birth defects and nobody knows why?
Whenever I get a whiff of some solvent ‘flashing off’ I exhale immediately and get the heck outta-there… Ignorance in this case won’t protect the innocent from themselves. Don’t breathe this junk. Well, unless you’re an industrial solvent junkie. Then breathe deeeeeeply…
I was a none believer until I used it on my 305 HO carb SS Monte Carlo. I have notice that my car saves 1/4 of a tank driving normally to and from work weekly as to without acetone. Also my car is so quit I can’t hear the engine running or knocking. Really wierd.
I just starting reading about this acetone business. Interesting thoughts. I know refineries / oil companies and there is no conspiracy. The major problem I can see with putting acetone in gas is the vapor pressure. This is regulated and even a small amount will increase this dramatically. You can make cheaper gas with more butane (heavier than acetone) but can’t add more and still make the vapor pressure requirements. By the way, thats the difference between summer and winter gasoline, the requirements change with the season. The requirements are there to help control the vapors (pollution) from gasoline as it sits in tanks or is transfered between tanks.
You can say that you know Oil companies and that there is no conspiracy, but the evidence is clear. If there is no conspiracy, Why is it that all oil companies raise their prices “equally” on the same day? Why is it that they have bought up every patent for carbuerators that would increase gas mileage? Why is it that the Auto makers switched from those carbuerators to fuel injection? The latter move sure wasn’t done to improve fuel economy, it was the only way they could ensure that “shade tree” mechanics wouldn’t be able to effectively work on cars. The conspiracy exists, The question is, How long before Americans get tired of paying for it?
One further thought, There was a man in Minneapolis a few years back who bought a new truck. He immediately noticed that he was getting better gas mileage than the vehicle was supposed to get. When he took it to the dealership for preventive maint., he mentioned how good the gas mileage was. The dealership checked and found that the truck was made to be sold in Europe, not the U.S.. They contacted the manufacturer, who contacted him. They offered him his choice of vehicles to give them back this vehicle. He refused, stating that he was happy and had no intention of giving up the truck. Soon after, his truck was stolen from his place of business while he worked. I don’t think you could call that coincedence. Why, if they have the technology to improve gas mileage for European vehicles, don’t they do it for American sold cars? It’s a conspiracy.
I couldn’t have said it better Ray. Anyone who downplays acetone
in fuel either works for the oil companies or the govt.
Because, the europeans don’t require all the stupid pollution controls that the U.S. govt. mandates.
That’s why.
I laughed hard.
a) FI can get vastly superior metering accuracy then carbs, as well as staying in tune for much, much longer, as well as being less susceptible to changes in conditions, as well as being more accurate over a range of engine conditions. It’s much, much more efficient.
b) American spec emissions restrictions are different to European - if you have to, for example, really really cut down on NOx emissions from your engine (and in America this is the case), then you can’t run it as lean as you might want to. You could also wipe up some more emissions with more focus on the cat(alytic converter), but that can add more backpressure which in turn can drop fuel efficency. There are dozens of trade offs that have to be made which effect your fuel efficency, and it is also LUDICROUS to think that just because we have the technology, we will use it. We could add solar panels to cars so we wouldn’t need an alternator, and take a few Nm of stress off the engine. Should we? No, it would cost a stupid amount of money and give next to no benefit
I havent tried it yet but from what ive seen acetone could POSSIBLY help MPG.
however if i was basing the credibility of the theory on the other things he claims in his FAQ i would say he is full of “”it”"
any alcohol, (but mostly ethanol) can be made to be MORE economical than gasoline, BECAUSE it has a high octane rating, and very greatly cools the intake air, now taking from my experience in high performance engines if you greatly increase the compression ratio, and advance the timing you get combustion that is many many times more efficient. If you designed and tuned an engine to run off of JUST E85 you would have a %10 overall savings and at the same time have TWENTY FIVE PERCENT MORE OVERALL POWER.
“oh and by the way you can eat that cake too ya know”
water mixed with gasoline is not good but water INJECTION, is one of the best things you can do for performance and if used in moderation WILL increase efficiency. you want the water to be mostly liquid all the way into the combustion chamber. like ethanol, water cools the intake charge because of the vaproation and the heat absorbed by the liquid water, also since liquids cant be compressed, it raises combustion chamber pressure, which raises efficiency.
i could continue enlightening you but theres probably only going to be 5 people who read this anyway.
Your case would seem more believable if you didn’t have so many grammatical errors in your post. Maybe you should take a few english classes with your spare time instead of posting mindless gibber.
Okay, D-Dayv. You cannot judge people by the way they write. It’s unfair and inaccurate. You simply don’t know what his experience is. You might as well judge people’s experience by the way they dress. Stop being a douche-bag and listen to what he’s trying to say, okay?
Oh, by the way, you forgot to capitalize the “e” in English. ![]()
well then i must have been one of the lucky 5 i just started using acetone in my gas - i have a mitsubishi montero sport and its original miles are 18 city 22 hwy i guess but i want to see what happens over the next three weeks im using a 2.5 floz to 10 gal ratio– as of right now ive got no results to post - but i will be posting again within the next 2 weeks — we shall see whgat happens– worst possible cenario– i destroy my engine beyond repair–oh yes just a footnot — the engine does run about 15 -20 degrees hotter when sitting at a traffic light for more than 4 minutes but that has eased -as i said we shall see what happens ill keep you all posted
Only old single spool jet engines used water injection. Totally replaced by new fuel efficient fan engines.
The old radial piston engines on aircraft used 115/145 octane gasoline with superchargers that required
water / alcohol injection to prevent detonation. Modern autos don’t have the high compression necessary
to take advantage of high octane fuels, or water/alcohol injection. So…… dream on buddy.
No way Jose!!! I tried it in my 97 F150 with 5.4 L engine and lost 2 mpg. From 14.7 to 12.8.
With gasoline at over $3.00 a gallon it was a expensive lesson especialy after facturing the cost of the acetone. At this time I don’t think you can beat quality gasoline with a minimal amout of ethanol, like none.
21.5 average town and country 3.8 2001 version
In two years all i ever got as a high was 22.8 mpg imperial
——————————–
25.1 with duralube
25.5 to 27.5 with acetone.
Same trip every weekend 52 times a year. was getting 366 miles per tank
now I get 399 miles per tank, which it never read before, for 2 years.
mpg are in imperial.
Highway 100 miles, city 125 miles city then I fill up.
I guess it does not at all work so I will give up and go back to 366 miles per tank…
D-DAYv, It looks as though you’re looking for errors in writing and not focusing on what is written. From what I’ve read, there are substantial savings which can be attained from using acetone in gasoline. I see no reason to disbelieve what is written by the folks here who have real testimonies regarding the use of acetone in their gasoline. What I don’t understand is why you would be so critical of something which is “TOTALLY IRREVELANT TO THE SUBJECT”. I know many corporate execs who have poor spelling, but they can run a business and speak at shareholder’s meetings.
JRI-SS had a lot of good and intresting information to share and I for one appreciate what he had to say. Thank you JRI and please continue with what you were saying.
>It’s also exactly what the oil and auto industries recommend (remember >these industries are doing everything they can to keep mileage down).
You lost me there. The Oil and auto industries actively lobby against lower mileage standards. The exact opposite of your statement is true: oil and auto industry is doing everything they can to avoid keeping mileage down!
I was repeating LaPointe’s claims. I have since edited that line for clarity.
Although I don’t think I believe that they lobby against lower mileage standards. I believe they lobby against higher mileage standards. Although I suppose they could lobby to simply have the standards remain unchanged.
All I know is I own a 2006 Dodge Caravan and have had it in the dealership 7 times for defective O2 sensors and the problem I am having with it kept occurring. I was getting only 10 mpg and having a lot of sputtering, stalling, check engine light on and loss of power until I started adding 2.5 oz Pure acetone per 10 gallons of 87 octane Shell gasoline. When we bought the vehicle it ran fine and I was getting appx 24 mpg city. now after using the “additive” I am getting appx 31 mpg city with no spitting, sputtering, power loss and the check engine light has not come on since. weather it’s a myth to everyone else or no who cares if it works for me then I am going to continue using it.
I’d change gas stations! sounds like your local gas station is “cutting” the gas with petrolium sludge. this will cause your car to run like crap because it’s clogging your injectors. Acetone is used in most fuel injector cleaners.
Any long term users had any issues to damage to the fuel system? Just got a used Silverado 1500HD to haul my RV and was looking for way to ‘help’ the mileage a little since the K&N filters etc, only help when you get up in the power band, not down where the rest of us live.
Also does anyone store premeasured amounts in small containers? I would also guess you would want to add it to the gas before filling up to achieve max mixing.
I have no direct knowledge but I would guess that the reason gas companies do not put it in at when the gas is manufactured is that it will most likely evoporate before it gets to the consumer.
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Acetone_as_a_Fuel_Additive suggests that some cars are definitely prone to damage. It makes sense because acetone will react differently with different materials. So some fuel systems will be safe and others may not be.
You raise an interesting point about vapor pressure (which is somewhat related to the ability to evaporate) that I hadn’t yet looked into. I doubt that acetone evaporates much more easily than gasoline in general, or some of the components of it, such as ethanol. However, there are regulations on gasoline related to vapor pressure. Dealers have to get waivers for certain gasolines blended with ethanol due to the vapor pressure issue. Since the logic goes that acetone will increase fuels ability to vaporize, it could be possible that if acetone came pre-mixed in gasoline, the vapor pressure would be too high and thus not allowable.
For the past three years I have been experimenting with acetone and have had only good results. I drive a ‘99 24 OHV Ford Taurus and before I started using acetone I was getting about 17 mpg. My driving is mixed, about 50/50 in and out of town. After 30,000 miles this is what I found..
I have used a variety of mixtures and have found 1.5 oz of pure acetone gives me about 27 mpg. I discovered this after using 3 oz and 4 oz mixtures. The 3oz got me up to 22-23 mpg. My logic was that if “a little” bit works…MORE will be even better!.. WRONG!.. With the 4oz my mileage actually dropped back to about 18-19 mpg.
1 1/2 oz of the stuff works for me. Plus the engine runs “so much” smoother. I hate to use the metaphor of a “Singer sewing machine”…but that’s actually what I was thinking when I was grappling with the change in engine performance.
Also, the tail pipe is burning browner.. the plugs are tan. I can see how it might not work in some vehicles, but as far as I’m concerned; it’s the best thing since sliced bread!
I am totally sold to acetone, (3 oz per 16 gallons). The acetone in the gas not only increases mileage, but also makes the car to run smoothly, I am currently using acetone and I will continue using acetone in my car for the following reasons:
Car runs much better; I have a mini van Toyota Siena 2001 with 131,000 miles
The smog check went so low that the mechanic said that for an engine with these miles the engine is running like a brand new car
Acceleration is wonderful; I have same response than when the van was brand new… maybe even better
I do not smell to burnt fuel in the morning and I have no smoke coming out from the tail pipe when cold, and absolutely none when is hot.
The increase of mileage for the last three months went from 17.6 mpg to 22.7 mpg average, and this is money that I did not spend
IF I follow, your erroneous figures of 8% of mpg increase, this still representing a sizable amount. If you follow current statistics,
US OIL DEMAND, 2004: Over 20 million barrels per day and 2007 is obviously higher ref.(http://www.gravmag.com/oil.html).
Subtracting 8% 1,600,000 – 20, 000,000 = 18400,000 of barrels a day
Supposing a sale price at the pump 0f 2.50, the Oil Companies will lose 4,000,000 per day. And a year 144,000,000 of dollars
It is not rare that they refuse to implement acetone in the gas, and is not rare that ANYONE will sell their soul to the Devil for much less than this.
Unfortunately, I think this web site has serious interest in BUSTING this TRUE, “Conspiration” theories are not my forte, however hiding the truth and publicizing a lie is not ethical, moral, or professional. I am sorry to read the opinion of this publisher … Mr. publisher sorry to “bust your myth”
Gabe
Anecdotes and testimonials do not constitute proof, let alone scientific proof.
Considering the high proportions of Americans who are bad math, science, or both, I am not at all surprised when some people think they discover something.
Considering your poor math and reasoning skills, I have little reason to believe you are capable of providing reliable test results.
After reading the material on this site and from Mr. LaPointe’s site. I think Mr. LaPoint is way to interested in conspiracy stories, however this acetone thing seems to work for some. you, NOBRAINer, seem to have issues with the perceived need to always be right. This is made very apparent by your hostile attitude toward those who carry opinions differing from your own. My view is that if it works, it works. But you both seriously need to get a life and some counseling. Its OK if people disagree with you and no, the world isn’t out to get you…
I apologize for expecting critical thought and real evidence.
My dad found out about acetone about 2 years ago. He has been using it in his ‘03 WRX and averages 2-3mpg increase per tank. I tried using it in my ‘94 Mustang GT with 130k miles. It was burning a lot of oil (1qt every 1000 miles). It didn’t appear to show any improvement. I just bought a ‘98 Civic LX (1.6L sohc non-vtec) with 95k miles. My first tank was 40.3mpg. I noticed that the oil was black, so I changed oil and filter, aired up the tires and put in about 200ml of acetone (from Ace hardware) and a splash of Marvels Mystery Oil. I just got 45.8mpg. Not bad. I think the car is only rated at 30/38mpg from Honda. I’ll definitely keep trying it out. I am only using one gas station to minimize that variable.
I have been using Acetone (Kleenstrip) for about a year now in my ‘98 F-150 (4.6 2wd). I have varied gas stations on several different occasions for experimental purposes and have found no real variation from my initial gain (now status quo) mpg which averaged is 17.78 mpg from pre-acetone of 14.59. Also, the carbon build-up that has been prevalent around my tail pipe has since dissipated. My two cents. Also I found my best mileage to be obtained from 1 fl. ounce per gallon of gasoline.
NoBrainer, here is a bit of critical thought.
Acetone has an estimated octane of 150. By using the *gasp* power of math you can estimate the octane increase of 3 ounces in 15 gallons of fuel.
Gallons of fuel added 15
Octane rating of fuel 91
Ounces of Acetone added 3
Residual fuel in tank 0
Octane of residual fuel 0
Final octane rating 91.234375
Not a significant amount, but it is a boost. On forced induction cars, acetone works not only to bump the 91 octane swill we get in AZ, but also to help prevent preignition. 3 oz of Acetone will allow us to dial in and extra 2-4 degrees of timing under boost which can be as high as 20 PSI.
I suspect the increases in gas milage reported is the same effect that performance parts use advertise. Some user bolts on part ABCD and gets 15 wheel horse power. The reason they gain so much was that the part corrected a flaw in the car’s build. (Example a different intake leaning out the mixture and the car’s ECU start having the proper measurments from the MAF simply by chance). The normal driver would not see much gain. Some drivers could even lose horse power.
Acetone is not a wonder substance that will free the world of oil. It is simply hydrocarbons that burn a bit slower and evaporate rather quickly. There are probably many cars that run on that ragged edge of the correct tune when using 87 octane fuel. The tiny bump in octane may be enough to simply let the car run more smoohtly. The best suggestion is try it, but be careful.
I can’t entirely agree. I calculate a lower final octane rating (using a weighted average calculation).
It does seem plausible that a slight increase in octane could improve some cars’ performance (those on the ragged edge of the correct tune).
However, if octane rating is the issue, the best suggestion is not to try acetone. Not at all. The best suggestion is to buy better gas. The same increase in octane can be achieved by just mixing in a couple gallons of the good stuff with the stuff you regularly use. Doing so will cost about the same as adding acetone, with less hassle and less risk.
Seems the real nobrainer here would be to try it. If it works for you, it works for you, if not then it doesn’t.
You really need to stop the nonsense and find out for your self Nobrainer. If you don’t want to make a minimal investment of money, and less investment of time than it’s taking you to keep these posting wars going on, then you should really just stuff a sock in your mouth (or rather around the fingers you’re typing with) and just shut up and get a life already.
Joe,
Go back and read the very first sentence on this page. Very. First. Sentence.
Damn, I like you Nobrainer
- Mainly your slightly biast opinion towards the truth, (I think I’m funny). I also think you have done a great many people a service by creating this page.
But - I don’t drive - therefore have no opportunity to find out if I can benefit from Acetone. But I am going to spread what I have learnt…
(I’d like to think I’m one of the 5)
Good day : )
Nonsense for years we have been able to purchase gasoline with different levels of octane. All studies have shown octane does not increae mpg. Otherwise to improve gas mileage you would just have to buy premium. Now I can see oil companies wanting mpg to stay low (even though it is at the highest level in history) to make more money. But auto companies have nothing to gain by low mpg and look at what Toyota and Honda are doing they keep pushing for better mpg. Of course trhey do not want higher standards because they no the US car companies still want to shove their ideas doan our throat instead of giving us what we want. So whether acetone works or not the conspiracy theories certainly do not. Also why does the govt want poor mileage? no one ever explained the theory
the octane rating of fuel is a characteristic, cannot be calculated by weight of the its components, the calculation is only applied for the reference which is a mixture of iso-octane and n-heptane.
ever heard of the octane rating of tetraethyl lead? so there
the rating is determined by tests such as Research Octane Number (RON) or Motor Octane Number (MON) or Anti-Knock Index (AKI)
now the idea of ethanol being an anti-knocking agent is a pile of steaming horse shit. the Japanese Navy knew that all too well and that was one of the reason why Japanese Zeroes outturned, outran and outclimbed all Allies fighters in WWII.
http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/product.biblio.jsp?osti_id=5192301
show me a sample of premium aviation gasoline (not jetA fuel) that does not contain acetone and methanol.
How about showing us samples of premium aviation gasoline that do contain acetone and methanol?
where are your from? Cambodia?
The point, which you so clearly missed, is that most of don’t know shit about aviation gasoline. Moreover, I’m not even clear on how applies to a conversation about automobile gasoline; most of us aren’t driving Japanese Zeros.
I tried acetone in by 2006 Chevy Uplander and I didn’t have much of an increase in milage. I knew this going into trying it. I wanted to make sure it wasn’t going to work well. In Illinois fuel is required to have 10% ethenol in it. This is why it didn’t work. The gas must be pure. The ethenol increased oxygenization in the fuel so it burns cleaner.
I did have an increase in milage I’m getting 2 miles to the gallon better in the city and on the highway. Driving habits can also help with milage. For example, you can coast more and use the natural terrain to you advantage. I coast on downhills, up to stop signs and traffic lights. Learn when you can cost on your daily driving and where you can start coasting. This has increased my milage a lot more than the acetone additive. (Don’t forget where I’m at has 10% ethenol in the gas). Don’t do the “jackrabbit” starts from stop signs and traffic signals. Increase speed at medium rate and do it smoothly.
I put acetone in the gas for my 1976 self propelled Lawnboy mower. The mower runs better and cleaner. It doesn’t have that 2 cycle smoke from the exhaust anymore. I’ll be checking to see how it work in the old Toro 2 cycle snow thrower this winter.
Well, you can always use the left-over acetone to make penetrating oil, mixed 50/50 with tranny fluid……..
You son of a bitch, I’m right behind you! Turn around and ASK me for a Heffer with cheese, yo!
I just saw a show called futurecar in which they explored alternative fuels and propulsion systems including 4wd electric motors and compressed air motors. While the idea of improving efficiency of existing fuel types was not covered, it did give me a thought worth exploring so this question I will pose.
Has anyone applied the ‘acetone test’ to a hybrid vehicle whereby the combustion engine is used to run the dynamo which provides the electricity to propel the vehicle?
My guess is that an engine which Is not directly connected to the road would make a better test subject due to a more constant load since in this configuration the ’stop and go, fast and slow’ variable of real world driving is reduced by the inductive/ capacitive smoothing effect of such a hybrid propulsion system.
In my best Bill Lumbergh impersonation, “yeah.”
Yeah, just put it in a hybrid and then all you have to do it figure out when the engine is actually running. Piece of cake.
To really control the variables, it’s best to run in laboratory conditions.
Go solar jail Bush (?) suggests putting acetone in a hybrid, then proceeds to incorrectly surmise the purpose of the electric components that set a hybrid apart from a conventional vehicle.
If acetone works as suspected, then the internal combustion engine portion of a hybrid should enjoy its asdded benefits, if any.
I have an ‘07 Prius, drive in Albuquerque and use acetone.
I have always seen an increase in mpg when I use acetone, regardless of summer or winter and regardless of high altitude driving or driving when I make it into the lowlands of TX.
I get 62 mpg on the hwy with no acetone and most of the superflous junk in the car taken out (carpet mats, dodad plastic shelves in the glove box, spare tire, jack, head rests on the rear seats, overinflate tires to 50 psi.) I have always seen higher mileage with my Prius on the hwy, as opposed to city driving, as opposed to the provocative claim Toyota makes about getting higher mileage with this car in the city.
Using acetone, I get almost 70 mpg on the hwy with my Prius.
I haven’t acheived it yet but I’m almost certain that topping off the tank at fill-up combined with using acetone (2 oz. per 12 gallons) would yield ~1,000 miles per tank full.
That would be a major acheivement, I think.
Find it interesting that one fellow had a problem w/pushing the use of a scan gauge or other device to accurately measure mileage. My 12 year old Jeep Grand Cherokee has one from the factory and in my opinion, should be mandatory on every vehicle. Why would you not want the most accurate measurement possible. Its also a bit disturbing to read ” I dont have to test it etc etc. geez….. Must be nice to be so positive w/out testing it yourself.
Ngz
I am now a believer in this stuff.
Yes I bought a Scangauge!
But before it arrived I did a gas mileage check without Acetone on my ‘04 Jeep Rubecon with a FI 4 liter and was getting an average highway mileage reading of 14.7 mpg trying to keep up with the speed limit of 75 mph (AZ) and pinging like crazy.
The first thing that I noticed after adding acetone 1 oz per 5 gal was that the pinging immediately stopped!and has not returned at any load on the engine and that the engine performance improved, (I know all subjective). But the first mpg check showed that the gas mileage actually decreased to 13.4! What the !!!. My theory was that something changed -either the gasoline formulation changed or my driving habits changed. I was using the gasoline from the same station for my evaluation. After doing some soul searching I did notice that my foot was a bit heavier on the throttle because I was enjoying the performance improvement. This was verified by the Scangage after it was installed.
I am now getting about 15.8 mpg after relearning how to drive economically using the scangage. I would try the same experiment with the Scangage without the Acetone but don’t want the performance loss.
I used the Acetone from Walgreens first and am now using the stuff from Ace now with no differance.
In reading the threads I am seeing a lot of backseat engineering and a lot of bull as how this stuff works without actually trying it out. I love the story about how the octane is actually reduced and the one about the O2 sensor temp differance causing the engine to run leaner. — Bull!!!.
Try it for yourself and see - the performance improvement is amazing. I can actually drive the speed limit in Az.
Forget acetone, one ASPIRIN per tank is all you need to increase your mileage by 24.5%! It works by reducing molecular forces in gasoline so it vaporizes better and burns faster. This has been confirmed in testing by U of T (University of Timbuktu) campus lawnmowers. Their highly sophisticated two stroke enfines got as much mileage as they could push them.
This is not a joke! There is big money to be made in selling Aspirin to gullible uneducated dimwits this continent is full of.
I CANT see it improving milage by changing gasolines burning properties but Maybe, JUST MAYBE it acts like a fuel injector cleaner and it only helps clear out injector build up. Thats why some people see an increase. All they have done is cleaned their injectors. They could have seen similar results by buying a bottle of regular ol injector cleaner. Just a thought.
nobrainer works for Chevron.lol You can talk down about acetone and make fun of it and call us ignorant dimwits all you want, while we are all out driving in our clean-burning vehicles. Seems to me like money is talking and bullshit is trying to do some walking in this thread. So who’s the real dimwits?
putting 2oz of a Acetone in gasoline increases miles up to 35% MythBusters are wrong. They are just saying that its BUSTED but its not b/c their helping the gas company if MythBusters said it worked everyone will do it
and that will destroy gas company’s
and you should use 2oz of acetone and 2oz of xylene for 10 gallons this will
will give more miles
Wow, it’s really amazing to see all the bad grammar in these posts.
wAtt gramar ar u taking aboot?
This is a discussion post, not a critical essay. Typos and grammatical errors are common in most every discussion board I have viewed. It is a matter of quickly adding an opinion. Perhaps, I need to run this through MS Word spell check and grammar check? While errors can be an annoyance, their impact on the discussion seems irrelevant (even though you could argue that such errors damage the credibility of the post).
I am more interested in the results, good and bad, of acetone additives. Thank you to all you grammatically “incorrect” individuals. Please, keep posting your results.
ACETONE AND XYLENE HAS GIVEN ME 2 MORE MPG ON MY JUNKER 85 BMW 318I THAT HAS A BROKEN HEAD BOLT. NOW IS @ 42 MPG. WILL BE ADDING A HHO 5 LITER CELL ALONG WITH MY O2 EXTENDER, VAPOR COLLECTION CAN, PCV ENHANCER AND THE BEST ADDITION IS THE PORTABLE OXYGEN CONCENTRATOR RATED @ 3 LITERS PER MINUTE.SHOULD LOOK AT 50 MPH OR MORE.
SAM
A whopping 5% improvement… another satisfied customer.
According to LaPointe’s handy-dandy chart, a 5% performance improvement (due only to acetone) should correspond to a mixture of about 0.25 fluid ounces of acetone per 10 gallons of gas. Actually the graph indicates ounces and not fluid ounces, so I guess it is important to weigh the acetone instead of measuring it volumetrically. But I digress. 0.25 fluid ounces in 10 gallons means that acetone represent 0.02% (or 195 parts-per-million) of the total mixture.
Same subject, differnt additive. I used a standard bottle of STP gas/injector treatment and saw a 4-6MPG increase when mixed with 10 gal. of 87 octance gas. Milage dropped after that tank was refilled. I’m thinking that this 2 oz. acetone is worth a try.
I am a mad scientist and I say that if you mix up 3 ounces of acetone with 5 ounces of budwieser and 10 gallons of gas, then your car will burn cleaner,get better gas mileage and feel less stress! It is TRUE! It’s on the internet!! (now anyway!) g’day people!
roxor your just an ass scientist,go out an buy a $5.00 32 oz can and try it yourself,yes most things on the internet are b/s,but this is a plausible experiment then can be done for a minimal investment..unless your spending all your money drinkin budwieser and paying rent to live in your mothers basement,then maybe the $5.00 is an issue….
I don’t have a dog in this hunt. I’ve never tried acetone in my car or any other additive to fuel. I agree that injector cleaning and the like should aid mileage, but I’ve never done it. I filled up my 1998 Infiniti I-30T today with 10 percent ethanol (E10) from Wally World (90 percent of my gas buys are from the same place) and calculated that I had got 23.36 MPG in the previous tank.
I think the issue here is utlization of BTUs in the fuel. Gasoline has 114,000 BTUs per gallon, E10 has 110,210 BTUs, ethanol having less energy than plain gas. The previous commenter who said that ethanol helps the fuel burn was incorrect. Ethanol is already highly oxygenated, which means that chemically it is already partly “burned” in comparison to plain gas. That’s one reason it takes 1.03 gallons of E10 to replace 1.0 gallon of gas, and the higher the ethanol ratio gets, the more it takes.
My car is going, average, 0.000212 mile per BTU of fuel. I would think that the real question regarding additives’ effectiveness, whether acetone or anything else, is do they raise the mile/BTU ratio?
That is why I would suggest that the bench testing of engines, while certainly useful in analyzing many things, would prove less accurate than controlled driving tests, say on a race track where other traffic and stoplights don’t exist and where and road characteristics are unvarying. Fuel quantities can be tightly controlled as can additives added.
In short, actual driving tests in a controlled driving environment appear to me to be the only really valid scientific way to investigate these claims. Driver input variability would actually be inconsequential since speeds could be well controlled and so could necessary variability in speed.
Having said that, and saying once again I have never added acetone to my fuel, I would say that the enormous numbers of drivers claiming they have gained a measurable increase in efficiency does itself constitute a self-organizing field test of a kind that should be taken seriously. As for lab testing, valid science requires construction an experiment based on observed data. If the experiment fails to replicate the data, a scientist doesn’t simply throw away the data, s/he asks what was wrong with the experiment.
Therefore, a fleet test with real, not simulated, driving would definitely be more valid than using benched motors, no matter what diagnostic equipment they are hooked to. The only valid condition to be tested is simply, “Do cars travel farther with acetone added than without?” Unless real cars are used to investigate, the bench-motor result is, IMO, prima facie invalid.
Whether anyone will actually ever conduct such a test I sure can’t say. But until it is done, the preponderance of evidence rests in favor of the enormous numbers of drivers who claim positive results, not with a single lab test under entirely artificialized conditions.
You’re not wrong. But, more importantly, you’re not close to being right.
Anyone else care to take a stab at a rebuttal?
“You’re not wrong. But, more importantly, you’re not close to being right.”
Ah, now there’s a real scientific statement!
Uh, no, it’s a gratuitous proposition, so I guess we can argue “yes it is,” “no it isn’t” from now til doomsday, and get exactly nowhere.
So: what scientific argument can you make that a one-off, benched-motor lab test is inherently more valid than an actual, controlled-conditions driving test of real automobiles?
Sorry for the curt reply earlier, but it was before work, and generally most commenters don’t bother to come back to engage in conversation.
What we’re really interested in is not what kind of mileage people say that they get with acetone. We’re most interested in knowing whether acetone as a fuel additive increases engine efficiency. That kind of study is perfectly suited to a benched-motor lab test or chassis-dyno test. Admittedly these tests should be repeated (and hopefully prove repeatable). However, such tests will determine whether or not acetone actually affects the mechanical operation and efficiency of the vehicle. If those tests are negative, it leaves an extreme likelihood that the source of the mileage improvement, or perceived mileage improvement, is human.
Fair enough. However, I still maintain that the central question is simply, “Do cars travel farther with acetone treated gas than without?” Hence, “engine efficiency” per se is not actually the primary thing, it is an issue subsidiary to the main question.
Of course, the number of variables in testing have to eliminated insofar as possible. Hence my suggestion of track testing, or “closed loop” testing.
Interestingly, closed-loop, driving testing is exactly what MIRA, a leading design, development & certification consultancy in the UK, did to certify their claims of a 61 percent improvement on their test cars using the company’s removable, rechargeable battery packs that can be retrofitted to most reasonably recent cars. (More details here.)
I have no doubt that MIRA did all kinds of lab testing of their designs, but their proof testing of achieved mileage was driving tests under conditions much as I described above.
So, “here I stand, I can do no other:” bench tests are useful for a large number of lines of inquiry, but are not determinative in the question before us in this thread: “Do cars drive farther on the road with acetone than without?”
So, as I am dealing with individuals’ anecdotal claims on the one hand, and useful but by no means decisive lab test on the other, I have to conclude that the question of acetone’s efficacy still has not been answered.
The MIRA example is different from the acetone case. It involves 1 car with 2 different drive trains, and, as a hybrid, we know ex-ante that engine efficiency is not the output to be measured.
Otherwise, you are correct that limited lab testing does not account for the possibility that acetone as a fuel additive somehow makes a car use less gas even though the acetone causes no change in engine performance.
For some reason I could not connect back to this page for a couple of days. Just got HTML gobbledygook.
At any rate, this issue is now settled in my mind for this reason: Two fillups ago, I added 2 ounces of acetone for the 18.5 gallons of gas in the tank in my 98 Infiniti I-30. The car, btw, has only 82,000 miles and all services done at the selling dealership, so it’s certainly “in tune.”
I then drove 311.1 miles, almost all of it on the interstate (three straight days of business travel).
Then I filled up again. It took 13.001 gallons. (How they measure gasoline to the thousandth of a gallon I do not know.)
Let’s see, that makes 23.93 mpg, rounded to two decimal places.
That’s a whole 0.6 better mpg than I got on the previous tank which was exclusively around-town driving. The EPA for highway driving for the car is 25 in the new EPA new rating; the 1998 rating was 28, which is close to what I have been actually getting.
So from my perspective, adding acetone robbed me of about 4 mpg. So I think I’ll just give the rtest of the acetone to my wife to take off her nail polish. I’m done with it.
Of course, my “test” was not scientific, but I’m just not personally curious enough to repeat it (not rich enough, either!)
Dear Redleg–With 18+ gallons of gasoline, you should have used 4 1/2 ounces of acetone. You use 1 oz. per 4 gals of gas…I have been using it for over a year in my Honda and consistantly get 39-40 mpg. instead of the usual 33-34 (interstate driving) My car is a 91 Accord 4 cyl. If you use either too much OR to little it will sometimes cost you mileage. I don’t know the chemistry of why it works, but it does. I traved round trip to Nashville, Tn. most weekends and have measured the mileage many times. So far there has been no damage to my car.–ROBERT– (D_PAPABEAR@HOTMAIL.COM)
Gee Bill why dont you try it in your coffee, maybe you will be more productive in the morning.
I have tested it on several cars and found the following:
1. works well in normally aspirated cars..if you have a supercharger or turbocharger, it seems to make no difference
2. does not work well in diesels. No effects in my testing.
I have a 1998 Ford F-150 4×4 with a 4.6 v-8 engine and auto trans. I started using acetone about two months ago. I use 1oz. p/5gal.of gasoline.
All I can say is WOW !! This stuff works! I went from 12-13 mpg around town to 15-16. Highway mileage is 21!!!!!
I used to own an old moving truck that ran like…well, an old moving truck. My mechanic suggested some acetone every fill up. It helped quite a bit. The engine behaved like I wanted it to. I never noticed a change in mileage. At 7 mpg, it was never something I would want to look at. I started putting more and more at a time. Soon, I was putting in about 1/4 gallon in a 40 gallon tank. The carburetor needed an overhaul after a few months. Thinking it was because of the age, I never even considered the acetone. The truck ran great for a few years after the rebuild, then started running rough again. I began mixing in some acetone again to clear the problem, and it did. I started mixing the same amount as before(1/4 gallon per tank) for preventive maintenance (notice I never clued in). Well the same problem occurred. I now know that too much can damage a carb. I just learned that on the net tonight. The truck is long gone and so are the bills.
From what I have read on the subject, I have come to the conclusion that acetone does wonders in small quantities as an additive for vehicles with higher miles. It cleans and smooths things out. If some people claim that acetone helps with their car’s emissions to the point of running like a new one, then this is good. I don’t know if it would help a nice shinny new car with a tight engine. That would be like taking an aspirin to feel better when we are not sick to begin with. I have seen some guy claim that a magnet attached to a rubber gas line can increase gas mileage over a period of 2 years. I don’t think he considered the fact that the engine is now broken in and SHOULD get better mileage.
My 1992 toyota is running rough so I will mix in some acetone and see what results I get. Noooooo, I wont put in a half gallon per tank. Just enough to see a difference(30ml). i will let you know of the changes.
uhh yea, Japanese Zeroes outturned, outran and outclimbed all Allies fighters in WWII…..
then one crashed on an island
then frogment went and took it apart and brought it back
then it was reassembled in arizona and tested
turned out it was made of PLYWOOD instead of aluminum and steel, the significant weight reduction gave it those advantages. nothing to do with the fuel.
also its main advantage was increased range, not flight characteristics.
fucking internet idiots
I am but a humble carpenter and find myself wary of snake oil salesmen and mad scientist as well as over obsessed spell checkers. I have read all of the above posts and it appears that there may be a common problem with introducing information for thaught to the general public, and that would be the general public itself. I am sure that something can be done about the average persons fuel economy on his or her personal vehicle, but it seems that on average the lose nut behind the wheel ultimately has the ability to maximize or minimize his vehicles use of fuel. Acetone is a good cleaner and could possibly help to improve an older vehicles economy by cleaning the system and would be noticed in the first or second tank. Newer vehicles would probably show minimal improvement if any. I don’t see how it could be destructive in such a small dose, used once in a while for maintenance purposes. But, the same amount of sand would definately have a negative impact. Variables such as what kind of gas, vehicle, climate, altitude, person or position of the earth in our universe or laboratory, result in differnt conclusions that will ultimately cause an argument. The fact of the matter is that we will all be at the mercy of our fuel provider(gas and elec) and it is up to us as individuals to overcome the fear of try and try again. I have decided to try acetone on an older vehicle of mine, a 92 f150 straight six. It is a service vehicle of mine and I maintain it diligently. Mileage has been logged daily for over 160k mi and it gets 14.9 mpg on average, which is about what it got new and I promise that if it makes a difference, good or bad, I will let you know.
I’m sorry, I can’t help thinking of this picture every time I read a comment containing “bigoil” in a non-ironic context.
Yes, the Mythbusters are part of the Zionist Overlord Conspiracy, meant to keep us all shackled to the grindstone to keep earning them the geld. Plus, 9/11 was a set-up, the moon landing was faked and wifi gives you allergies.
Sheesh.
I’m from Guatemala, and I remember on mid 80’s we been so bad limited with the gasoline, We wasn’t able to buy more than 5 gallons a day even when we had money to pay for it, also the line to get the fuel pump was so big (usually at least 3 hours to reach the pump, like Disneyland lines!!). My dad did his weird mix using acetone, thinner and nafta balls (yes, the smelly ones) we did the mix with 3 nafta balls, 1 oz acetone and 2 oz lacquer thinner per 5 gallons of gasoline and, believe it or not, 10 gallons of kerosene. I remember the face of the other drivers when we park the car at the kerosene pump at the back of the gas station and poor the kerosene on the tank. Of course the first days we had to deal with the police because they were thinking we are cheating but after they smell the kerosene they just gone. My car was able to run, of course was not smooth at all, and the emissions were kind of nasty and the engine ping a little bit, but at least we was able to use the car when others had problems to do it. I had a Ford Econoline 1977 with 8V 302cc.
My point is, probably the acetone make the miracle on my car. I’m now start using 3oz per 10 galls, plus 2oz xylene and 1 oz syntetic oil on my Lincoln Navigator 2001 (12.3MPG) and I will post here if I have any improvement.
I don’t know about the acetone but I am willing to try it. As for the scan gauge I do have one and I find it very usful to help me gauge my driving habits. I also find it extremely good when I go to a mechanic as I know the problem with my car and can tell the mechanic the problem. It gives the same codes as the garages scanner. Ifind my scan gaige very usful.
I tried acetone, but screwed up. The gasoline had ethanol in it. It’s getting harder to find the stuff with no ethanol. Some of the filling stations with their boastful signs touting “REAL gas here” now meekly state they have ethanol free, but only their premium gas. There is a station about 10 miles away that sells both with and without ethanol in the lower octane (87) grade, and it costs 4¢ more than with ethanol.
I now have a tank of ethanol free, with about 4 oz. acetone in it. Got it at Wally World, and it says “100% acetone”, but it also states it’s anti-bacterial. I’ll do a couple tanks like this and report back. My usual mpg on my Honda CR-V is 25-27 mpg.
I am gong to try as well, see you in a couple of weeks.
Not much to report yet. I filled the tank again, and my mileage acetone vs. no acetone is identical. My vehicle is “picky”, though. I’m going to fill up at the same gas station, same pump. If the ground tilts, and it always does, you may not get a full tank, due to air pockets.
If I do not see at least a 10% improvement,(29-30 mpg) I will label this experiment a failure, at least for my vehicle.
Well, I have to say first that my jaw has dropped because rather than sticking to the issue people are attacking each other.
The issue here being does acetone help fuel mileage or not. You can’t run a laboratory test on this because people don’t drive their vehicles in laboratories, ever. You have to run a real-world test on this stuff and your findings won’t always be conclusive. The bottom line is rather than fight about it with opinions, try adding a few ounces to your tank and see if it helps. I know for me, it has helped a bit here and there and if nothing else it makes my vehicle run smoother. My question is then, how can it be bad? The money I save on gas more than pays for the acetone AND my vehicle runs better. What is the downside here? For me this issue is over. I use it in my older engines to help them run better and I will continue to do so because I have experienced the benefits personally. You should try it too and if you don’t think it does anything then don’t do it… Simple decision…
1 - You’re on the internet and your surprised by personal attacks? Let me be the first to say, “welcome to the internet.”
2 - You absolutely can run tests on acetone in the laboratory, and you absolutely should, and if acetone works it should be wholly demonstrable in a laboratory setting.
Nobrainer is correct. Laboratory bench tests can be run on acetone-gasoline blends. Field tests can be run, too, but they need to be blind or better yet, double blind, where neither the driver nor the formulator know which car is getting the acetone and which car is getting a “placebo”.
I am surprised the makers and sellers of acetone haven’t done this and, if it really works, promoted their product now that gasoline is so expensive. This doesn’t seem to have happened, so I am sceptical of acetone’s value as a mileage improver.
But we have a bottle of acetone in the lab where I work. Two ounces isn’t very much. I’m sure one of the techs would give me some. I’m tempted to try it.
Wife an i just made a 6hr trip, increased gas milage by 5 miles per gal using,(virgin acetone), (100% synthetic oil), an Z-max) an oil additive.
This was not my frist test, Guys the shit woeks! ![]()
you acetone “believers” are idiots. mechanically higher mpg out of a higher octane liquid actually doesnt make sense, but whatever… you’re getting 357.3 miles per 10 gallons.. who am i to argue… keep spending your money trying to find a fix to your terrible gas mileage problems in your cars. i’ll be laughing at you at the gas station when i pull up on my bike bouncing off the rev limiter at 12k, and beating the shit out of it, and then i’ll proceed to fill up with $12 of PREMIUM gas, calculate my mileage to be somewhere in the neighborhood of 50mpg, and then wheelie on out of there to do it to someone else 200 miles down the road.. yeah, i said 200 miles off of 3.8 gallons… damn must be nice huh?
Heh, I bet you will. I will be laughing as I drive by the ambulance as they load you in the back of it and scoop your bike out of the ditch after you wheelie out of the parkin lot.
That is why you have varying results. Also make sure to change your fuel filter within the first few tanks. Even the little acetone you add cleans out the tank & fuel system WELL, thus sludging up your filter & then sometimes breaking the fuel pump. All you neigh sayers.. WHY THE FUK ARE YOU HERE EVEN? Hmmm…
The acetone believers aren’t idiots. They are looking for a way to solve a problem in their lives, namely, the high cost of motor fuel. It’s all very well to dismiss them with solutions like buy a hybrid, or buy a motorcycle. Why not buy a horse? Maybe hypermiling will replace NASCAR as our favorite auto sport.
Since our national fleet of low mileage vehicles can’t be changed out over night, people are looking for other solutions. The internet offers quite a number of them, acetone in gasoline being only one. My favorite is build a still in your garage and make your own ethanol from yard clippings. If you don’t want to drive it, you can always drink it.
I will keep this simple. Acetone in gasoline has given me better mileage on every tank of gasoline with acetone as an additive. I have a Dodge 06 Caravan W/3.8 engine. First, tires need to be at the correct pressure or higher. It helps if the vehicle is clean, less drag. I went on a 2500 mile trip and used acetone on the whole trip except for 200 miles. I changed gasoline brands and wanted to empty the tank. My DTE readout after the trip read 500 miles after fill up. Before acetone the highest was 427 after fill up. Wind and temps also affect the mileage. The last 1028 miles was all highway miles thru rain, wind, temps between 65-95, mountains, straight highways, 7 rest stops and one stop overnight. When the outside temperature was over 70 the A/C was on. The last six hours of driving the A/C was off and it was raining. The best gas mileage that I ever got was 25 MPG with this vehicle before using acetone and that was keeping the speed under 62 MPH on a straigth highway with the A/C on. Except for the first 280 miles I drove normally, the speed limit or the flow of traffic. My first fill up I got over 28.34 MPG. After that, I decided see what the real performace is with acetone. My opinion is acetone flat out works, it is a “no brainer.” I started using 4oz. 100% virgin acetone per tank. I am now using 6oz. per tank. There are many variables. So you can sit around and pick apart the science without real information or go and experience real science. There will always be people that can’t do science. Just like some people can’t cook. But those who can do science should get out there and try using acetone in gasoline. A college degree does not automatically qualify a person to pursue science. I know one unbeliever that has a Mustang with a 5.0 engine. After puting 4oz. of 100% in a tank, said the engine ran smoother but was only getting 10 MPG. I asked if he checked the PSI in the tires. He said no. I checked the PSI of his tires. They were between 21 and 27 PSI. He is now running his tires at 44 PSI.
OK, I have a 1995 Ram3500 Van with a 5.2L V8. It is well tuned and I am now getting 16.9-18mpg highway going about 450 miles each way. I will post my results after the next trip using acetone. It seems 2oz per 10 gallons is the optimal ratio? I will be disappointed if I do not hit the 20mpg milestone. If I can average over 20 I will be a believer. Should have results in a couple weeks.
This is just pathetic. Why are so many people wasting there time arguing about acetone? If it is working in your car why do you care if a stranger online doesn’t believe in it? If you don’t believe why do you care if its working for someone else? If you want to fix the oil problem in this country take your argument to the government and stop stroking your ego’s by trying to outsmart random idiots in a forum.
If you want to fix the oil problem in this country take your argument to the government and stop stroking your ego’s by trying to outsmart random idiots in a forum.
But you repeat yourself…
I think my idea of pathetic differs slighty (understatement), wasting would mean that there is nothing to gain from this but only to lose something - no idea where your going with that one! I could continue but there’s no point.
People go to the internet and find information so that they can attempt to create an opinion of their own, the more someone is able to use the information effectively - the more use it is.
Anyway - I find (my opinion with zero evedience) that the goverment/oil companies, etc, can’t apply certain additives for the simple reason that if ya did then it would piss someone one off enough to sue for wrecking their engine (as it’s already been “proved” (i.e. everyone agrees) everybody experiences it slighty differently), because lets face it, society doesn’t make people feel small (kinda - people vs people etc - (I know I’m getting vague))
And out of curiosity - who’s trying to outsmart who? so far everyone is just trying to find out a piece of information - Acetone and its effects…
Oh except you of course - your just trying to put people down - oh and me too - im just trying to put you down >:^(
I have been running laboratory grade acetone at 2 oz per 8 gallons (one-half tank full) in an Accord four cylinder, stick shift for the past three weeks. The gas mileage on this car was not bad to begin with, and the addition of acetone has had no significant effect on my mileage. Driving more slowly, accelerating slowly, and shifting into the higher gears ASAP seems more effective. I try never to let the engine speed exceed 2500 rpm. In other words, I’m driving with common sense for a change. Shutting down the AC would also make sense, but after all, this is July. I think I’ll wait until fall.
I’ll stop the acetone, though. I’m still looking for the magic bullet though. I’m fascinated by these devices that hydrolize water, and blow a mixture of H2 and O2 into the air intake manifold. Hydrogen gas is a combustible fuel, and if the water can be hydrolized by a solar panel, well, that ends the second law of thermodynamics argument.
I’ll let you know.
Hi Nobrainer, I was being serious. No satire.
I should have said the first law of thermodynamics, which goes to the idea that a system cannot be used to create more energy than it had to begin with.
Some internet physicists have argued that in a running automobile, if the battery is used to hydrolize water, the alternator will have to work harder to charge the battery, and the engine will have to work harder to run the alternator, and more gasoline will be used to run the engine, and therefore the energy gained from the hydrogen will not be more than the energy in the gasoline used to produce it. I don’t know enough about a car’s electric circuits to know if this is true, but it may be.
However, if an independent source of electricity, like a solar panel mounted on the roof of the car, makes the hydrogen, no potential to violate a physical law exists. In theory, gasoline combustion should go down–replaced by hydrogen combustion. Could a solar panel make enough hydrogen to matter? Dunno, but I’d like to find out.
Either way, the laws of thermodynamics are going to apply. It’s not just internet physicists that will tell you that.
When it comes to producing hydrogen from electrolysis (the splitting of water using electricity), it is not cheap, or at least not a freebie, especially if you have to buy a solar panel to create the electricity. About 2 years ago I looked at producing hydrogen from solar panels. In short, a few square feet of solar panels will only produce a miniscule amount of hydrogen. And, if you want a lot of hydrogen, you have to dish out A LOT of money up front to cover the capital costs.
Speaking of miniscule amounts of hydrogen, I believe that any on-board hydrogen generator, which is likely just a little electrolyzer, is likely only capable of producing a tiny, tiny amount of hydrogen, probably so little as to be completely insignificant.
Now, I think part of the argument of adding hydrogen to the fuel mix is it will make the gasoline burn better (part of me thinks that adding the oxygen bi-product of electrolysis doesn’t hurt either). Small ratios of hydrogen, per the argument, will cause significant fuel mileage increases. In other words, the argument is very similar to the acetone argument.
Having said that, the best thing to do in the short run, if you are determined to test hydrogen, is to simply buy tanks of it. They certainly sell tanks of hydrogen (not at Wal-Mart, but from gas distributors).
Mike wrote, “If you want to fix the oil problem in this country take your argument to the government and stop stroking your ego’s by trying to outsmart random idiots in a forum.”
Take your problem where? Surely you jest, Mike. In a democracy, governments are elected to create problems, not solve them.
Greetings All
I am on the fence about this subject, there are a lot of Pro and Con about this subject, but (then again) this is the Internet :-}
I find this subject curious enough to test it myself (I am not leaning one way or another). I have done a few Hypermile tests myself on my car (example: http://www.smartcarofamerica.com/forums/f26/final-chapter-has-begun-5242/ ) and as can be seen (via the link) I drive a 2006 Smart car.
The 1 thing I have noticed in most articles is the recommendation of using the ScanGauge II, I believe the moment ANYONE can see the instant MPG they will change their driving habits.
I have been tracking my mileage (via here http://www.spritmonitor.de/en/detail/194504.html )so have a year of info to compare to.
My first goal will be to find a gas station that GAS only (non E10) and bench mark that. Then remove my trip computer (forcing me to drive normal)
and after a few tanks of pure gas start the test.
My car only has 14K+ mileage on it and I’m not worried about the % of acetone to gas in this car to stop me.
As an engineer I tend to be a little anal (I don’t like to lie to myself), by NO means will I suggest my findings will be final on this subject, but they will be for me.
I’ll book mark this Blog to make sure I update my findings, BUT it will be months before I have a final opinion (1 tank of gas every 2 weeks makes for a long test)
This will be FUN
Brent
Hi Nobrainer,
Your comments about generating on-board hydrogen go my concern, that so little hydrogen can be generated by one or two solar panels or 12 volt battery, the effect on mileage would be insignificant.
I don’t think the reason for blowing hydrogen into the air manifold is to make the gasoline burn better; it’s just a supplementary fuel that has a BTU content of its own. The feasibility of an effective, on board, hydrogen generator can be, and probably has been, mathematically worked out. If these devices worked, you can be sure Wally World would be selling them, and every auto parts store, too. They aren’t.
The same for acetone. If it worked, don’t you imagine the Acetone Producers Association, if they exist, would be running ads on TV to promote acetone? There would be an acetone buying frenzy! There would be world-wide shortages! There aren’t.
Comments to Brent: Kudos to you for trying to run a controlled test. My acetone test was unabashedly biased. Hell, I wanted it to work, but it didn’t. Can you improve your test by blinding it a bit? Over the test period, let your wife (girlfriend, etc.) put the acetone or a placebo (gasoline?) in your tank, and don’t let you know which one. Then, drive your Smart Car with a scanguage, just as you normally would, and let us know what your findings are. I’m sure you can design a good test.
I’m pretty much in agreement with you.
H2 may work to some extent as a supplementary fuel. It would be interesting to know the burn characteristics and how well it could be mixed in large quantities with gasoline. That said, some websites are definitely claiming that their water-to-fuel kits will make combustion way more efficient, yada yada yada.
my 96 civic gets 38 mpg w/o the air on and 34 mpg with the air on
with 1/4 cup of 100% acetone and 11 gal. of gas, i got 29 mpg
h m m m m m m m m m m m
I have read everyones comments. I guess if it works, then use it. I am going to try it in my ‘97 Saturn SL2. I am only getting about 21 MPG with AC right now so I hope it will help. My question would be, though, what about long term effects on the engine, throttle body, etc. Is there potential damage using it for long periods of time? Anybody know?
I read an article in 2003, not by LaPointe, regarding acetone in fuel and decided to try it. I first tried it on a 1996 Thunderbird and noticed a 25% increase in mileage. This was compared to gasoline only. How? My daily commute was 30 miles (mostly highway) each way and I logged 35,000 miles on that car. I used the same gas station for 2 months to limit variables. It was difficult to believe at first, but the results were there.
I then used it in my 2004 Ford SportTrac 4×4, which I bought new. I did not start using the acetone until there was 1000 miles on the car, so I could make sure I would have clean data. Using the same commute, I noticed that my MPG went from 15 to 19 MPG. I had no engine trouble and no fuel line issues. That truck took 54,000 miles in 2 years. As a salesman, logging miles is a daily task and made it easy to keep track. I am now using it in my 2007 Pontiac G6, bought new, without issue. After 28,000 miles I can attest to the increase in MPG and so does the dashboard sensor.
The one piece of advice to see an increase is to use the proper amount. Any more than 3 oz per 10 gallons of 87 octane gas has diminishing returns. One tank of gas will not show such dramatic results in your mileage. You will notice the change by the third tank. Try it yourself. If it works for you, use it. If not, don’t.
Hi, I will be trying this in my 96 Accord starting today. Sure, it’s anectdotal, but then again, my wallet isn’t. I think I’ve read every word uttered on this subject on the internet. So far, haven’t found the naysayers to be too evidence-heavy, other than “theorizing” and mostly pontificating.
On the other hand, the REAMS of people willing to post and say, “hey, lookie what I got mileage-wise”, is overwhelmingly abundant. The positives far outweigh the neg’s when it comes to mileage improvement. In fact, I would say that a substantial number of the “no MPG improvement” posters, are using the wrong % of acetone or have a poorly running vehicle to begin with.
The others, may have that config. of fuel delivery systems and efi’s and such that just won’t allow for an improvement no matter the ratio of acetone.
So really, I could care less about what some scientific wannabe in some lab bench test’s something at, and certainly don’t care about a 1 shot experiment from Mythbusters, they may “approach” something from a scientific perspective, and for that I applaud them, but that doesn’t always mean they have scientifically ruled anything out. Let me see them try this on a variety of vehicles and a variety of ratios over a period of time not just one experiment.
Will bookmark and check in in the future. If it doesn’t work I WILL SAY SO.
I recently took an 1148 mile trip with my 06 Caravan w/3.8 engine. Same vehicle that I posted my previous results. On my last trip using the instruments that came with the vehicle, they read that I could go over 500 miles on a tank of gas. This most recent trip I drove 532 miles on a tank of gas with some gas left in the tank. I have concluded like others, 3oz. of acetone per 10 gal. works best. Temp 75-98 with the A/C on the whole time. MPH 60-70. No Brainer wants “verifiable, repeatable, (at least semi)-scientific evidence that says that acetone really does increase fuel mileage nearly as well and as broadly as claimed.” Before using acetone the longest distance I drove after fill up was 430 miles. Yes I can drive a longer distance using acetone with BP or Chevron gasoline. After that 532 mile trip on one tank of gasoline, I switched to Exon because I didn’t know when I would see the next BP or Chevron station. To the acetone nay sayers, I understand. I did not see any improvement using acetone with Exon gasoline. Those that do not see improvement on the highway using acetone, it would be nice to know what brands of gasoline that do not provide a performance improvement with the use of acetone.
As far as your rebuff to this, You did mention Chevron has a website about saving Fuel. I have to say that I am surprised to see you use Chevron as a reputable company. I currently live in The Louisville Kentucky area. Chevron is by FAR the most expensive fuel company in this area. When I say By FAR, I mean $.20 per gallon or more above everyone else. I have actually seen them sell for as much as $.30 more per gallon. What a JOKE!! Do they think they are selling Gold? Who are they to be reputable when it comes to suggestions on saving gas? I can’t believe anything that ANY Gas/Oil company says but Chevron especially. Personally, and I track my mileage on every fill up, ranging between 32-35.8 miles per gallon. The best mileage I have ever gotten has been with Shell gasoline. 2006 Scion XA, 40,000 Plus Miles, Mobil 1 5w/30 Synthetic Motor Oil since first oil change, I have driven 403 miles on a single tank of Shell Gas, mostly Highway miles. Usually get about 345-365 miles per tank.
Please don’t use Oil/Gas companies as being reputable in disputing things such as this. Who can take them seriously?
Thanks
Rich
Your claim: Chevron gasoline is “$.20 per gallon or more above everyone else” in Louisville.
The contrary evidence: LousvilleGasPrices.com. As I write this, that site lists 5 stations have regular gas selling for an area-high $3.99/gallon. 1 is shell. 1 is Marathon. 3 are Chevron. That doesn’t look good for Chevron, however your claim is demonstrably false.
Wow, you are that gullable huh? Did I say “ALL CHEVRON STATION’S” Are high? Hmmm, Let’s look, No I didn’t say it was every single station. What you don’t see on that site, is that as I Sit here writing this, and I just not 5 minutes ago drove by this very Chevron Gas Station here in Jeffersonville In (Right across the bridge from Louisville) on 10th street while most other stations are selling gas today for $3.71-3.75 per gallon they have it for $4.09. Let’s do the math, that’s $.38 cents higher. They aren’t the only Chevron station that high, or close to that high in the Louisville area. Chevron is the highest here, by far. I don’t care what LouisvilleGasPrices.com says. I live here.
Rich
Yes, let’s look at what you said.
“I currently live in The Louisville Kentucky area. Chevron is by FAR the most expensive fuel company in this area. When I say By FAR, I mean $.20 per gallon or more above everyone else.”
Did you say “all Chevron stations”? No, absolutely not. But you compared Chevron to “everyone else”. Therefore, if any, ANY, non-Chevron station within the Louisville, KY, area is priced to within 20 cents/gallon of the most expensive Chevron station in the area, then your claim is wrong.
No, my claim is not wrong, Chevron continues to be the most expensive gasoline retailer in this area. Some of them still posting prices nearly $.40 above other stations. I am beginning to think maybe you either work for, or have some financial interest with Chevron? Why would you argue in support of them so strongly otherwise? I mean, personally I like Shell Gasoline but only because I have experienced by far the best mileage from Shell over and over again. Yes, they are a bit more pricey than most of the others (though cheaper than the local Chevron stations) but the benefits by far outweigh the costs. I have not tried the acetone as of yet, but am considering it still. I am truly concerned about any long term damage that may be caused by adding acetone or any other chemical to my tank.
What I will not be swayed by is anyone’s argument that appears to give support to the Big Oil companies or the thought that there is no way to improve the current gasoline engine in any way. Way back in 1987 I purchased a brand new 1987 Mitsubishi Mirage with a 1.5 litre 70hp engine. The same size that is in my current 2006 scion xA. My Scion I am sure has more HP. Now I consistantly got 40mpg driving that Mirage. I put over 63,000 miles on that car in 1-1/2 years and drove it like I owned a Porsche. It had a 4 speed manual transmission. That being said, with my Scion here it is 20 years later and with all the “improvements” that have been made over the years my Scion only gets 36mpg max? I don’t drive like I own a Porsche anymore as I am older and wiser.
Either I have misunderstood your claim (If you’re claiming that a single, local Chevron station is 20 cents more per gallon than the average of any other local chain, then I’d say that you are probably right, but that it is a stupid comparison), or you’re ability to make logical comparisons is wanting. Perhaps you are only claiming that they are, in general, the most expensive. I’d probably agree with that.
Do I work for Chevron. No. Never have. Do I have a financial stake with Chevron? You bet your ass I do. I own several indexed mutual funds which invest in all the major oil companies. So why am I quibbling with you? Because you made a claim which I don’t think can justified. That’s just how I am.
As for your cars, I think you pretty much summed it up with the horsepower comparison. The curb weight of the Scion is 300 lbs (15%) more than the Mitsubishi, and the horsepower is at least 22 (~25%) greater with the new car. Engines and cars can be improved. However the improvement is not free, and for the last 20 years consumers have been far more interested in horsepower than mileage.
Rich - The difference between your cars is the performance that can be extracted from the engine. Different bore size, stroke length, compression chamber design, valve sizing & durations, I could go on forever. Cars in the 80’s got great mileage because we were in an oil crisis. Cars back then also had a lot different emission requirements. You can get great mileage out of some engine setups but at the expense of exhaust emissions. My fiance’s 2001 Ford Focus with a little SOHC 2 liter 4 cylinder engine with about 100K on the ticker usually got on average low 20’s in MPG. A year or so ago I filled up her tank with a mixture of acetone just as a test. A mix of highway & country driving to the lake over a period of about 300 miles yielded me an average of 36 MPG. I never went above 60 on the highway though. She just recently had a new long block installed and I just went on a trip with her again, no acetone this time. We averaged 31 MPG with speeds sustained between 65 and 75 for most of the trip, some stop & go city traffic but most highway. I believe the most crucial part of mileage to the gallon is a properly maintained & running engine. If tolerances become to great it will not run smooth and not produce as much power as it was designed to. Simple things to do. Accelerate slower, anticipate traffic patterns to reduce stop & go situations, switch to synthetic lubes, keep up on lube changes, rotate & check tires pressure occasionally, fill up with quality gasoline like shell or chevron or bp/ammoco.
It could be you have sympotoms of anal retension, I would too if I owned mutual funds
When getting inspected, there is a printout of emissions.
Does anyone have emissions test results of using Acetone in gas?
Like printout results befoe using Acetone & printout after using it?
I would sure be interested in the comparison.
No opinions Please, actual results only. Too many chest-thumpers here think just because they keep saying it ‘don’t work’ we’re supposed to accept it as proof, when so many others have tried it and it works for them. Why would they lie? I don’t think they have a reason to lie. But there are many reasons both financial and political to say it doesn’t work. Oh yeah, let’s not forget the monster ego that sleeps beside them next to the bed at night. So pleas if you have these statistics print them.
I’m with you. I’ll gladly change my position when I see someone run some real tests and show that acetone works. For all the people who claim it works, I have yet to see one, single, well-designed test that puts weight behind their claims. The people behind the claims aren’t necessarily lying, they’re probably just wrong.
Just for the record, I have obtained 29 MPG on different highways with different gasolines in different parts of the country with different temps. I went from going only around 430 mile per tank w/o acetone to 532 miles per tank using acetone. My results are repeatable. Another example is my change to Exxon gasoline and losing MPG with acetone and going back to Chevron or BP and getting 29 MPG. My last experience/test with the air filters is another of my repeatabe tests using acetone in gasoline where acetone makes a difference. Have you tested different air filters while using acetone in your gasoline? Why don’t you try that and get back to all of us with your results?
How about this for a test:
3 different vehicles will be used during the test
vehicle #1 will be a small 4 cylinder car
vehicle #2 will be a minivan with a V6
vehicle #3 will be a pickup truck or van with a V8
All vehicles will be filled with gasoline from the same company, Shell or Chevron (since the claim is these companies have the fuel that supports acetone enhancement)
The test will consist of driving each vehicle on the same road for 300 straight miles with the cruise control set at the same speed for each test. I figure that this experiment would work best on open roads in western states. Each vehicle will do the 300 miles with just gasoline twice. The average MPG for these two tests will be the control MPG.
Then, each vehicle will receive 2 tankfuls of 1 oz per 10 gal ratio and drive the same route at the same speed.
Then the vehicles will repeat the experiment with 2 oz per 10 gallons for 2 tankfuls.
Then the vehicles will repeat the experiment with 3 oz per 10 gallons for 2 tankfuls.
Then the vehicles will repeat the experiment with 4 oz per 10 gallons for 2 tankfuls.
Then the vehicles will repeat the experiment with just plain old gasoline, and the results will be tabulated.
If there is any increase in the average MPG (at least 1-1.5 mpg minimum), then the experiment would conclude that further evaluation is needed, but the probability is likely that there was an enhancement from the additive.
If no noticeable increase in MPG is experienced, then the claim is not proven, and no further experimentation would be needed unless there are unusual circumstances (ie sustained rain, dramatic difference in weather conditions, etc.)
Some might claim that traffic may be an issue, but in this circumstance, with the cruise control being used and all driving performed on the same stretch of highway, changes in driving habits would not be an issue.
Any experiment such as this, in my estimation, would be about the best type of combination for lab testing and real world results.
Just my .02.
And I don’t work for a big oil company, acetone production facility, Walgreens, Home Depot, Fredricks of Hollywood, The New York Times, the US gov’t, Adam & Eve, a car manufacturer, an asphalt producer, Ollie North, Enzyte, or Tony Montana. I’m just an American trying to earn a living, take care of my family, and save a few bucks.
For the last several weeks, I’ve had an experimental outline made in my head, but I haven’t managed to write it out, so I’ll take the opportunity to do so now (Hopefully I’ll also do a better, more complete write up later). I think most testing, as reported on the web, has inadequate baseline testing. Hopefully that gets around this issue while not requiring days and days and thousands of miles of effort.
But the basic idea is this:
- Get a car that can measure it’s own mileage (or if a scangauge can do this, use that).
- Pick a stretch of road that is relatively open and flat.
- On that road, get up to a pre-determined, set speed.
- Set the cruise.
- Then re-set the mileage calculator.
- Go some set distance, a mile is probably good.
- Record the average mileage for that mile.
- Then turn around and do the same thing (this would actually be better if you had access to a 1 or 2 mile oval, for example, a race track).
- Keep the up-the-road data separate from the down-the-road data.
- Rinse and repeat 10 to 20 times.
Hopefully the data will provide a pretty stable average, if not, it may be a good idea to do more baseline tests.
Then then add the acetone and do the same thing the same number of times.
With this method, you can generate many data points, which helps to demonstrate statistical significance, or lack thereof. It also means that this can be accomplished by traveling only 100 - 200 miles and taking only 2 to 4 hours to complete.
95Avalon, why do you want to see emission printouts? Acetone is being added to gasoline to improve MPG, not emissions, or have I missed your point?
There are as many financial and political reasons for acetone to work as not to work. Acetone is readily available and its sellers would love for you to buy it pour it in your gas tank, or clean your fingernails, as your heart desires. But acetone cannot work for some and not for others; either it works or it doesn’t, and for MPG improvement, only a properly controlled bench test can tell us for sure. Anything else is tantamount to witchcraft.
We are looking for a magic potion, but what we will get is a change of lifestyle and technology. All of us will learn to drive smarter with smaller, more efficient engines using a combination of new technologies and truly alternate fuels. I don’t believe two or three ounces of acetone in a tank of gas will play a serious role in any of this.
If I understand the principles previously stated, acetone ’spreads’ the gasoline molecules farther apart.
This causes fewer molecules to be burned per individual ignition/firing, so less gasoline is used compared to before acetone addition to go the same miles (all things being equal).
If this is the principal of the better/increased mileage, then it stands to reason that less gasoline molecules being burned in the same time as before would also mean less HC released out the tailpipe into the atmosphere, as compared to before acetone introduction.
This would therefore be a benefit to the environment as well as the wallet. Or is it too hard or beyond your grasp to connect the dots?
So… to answer your question, I guess you missed the point.
But if you have a set position on this or any other issue I also realize that you will refuse to be confused by the facts.
to add to the above:
This is why I asked for statistics, no opinions: “I don’t believe two or three ounces of acetone in a tank of gas will play a serious role in any of this.”
Preconceived opinions play absolutely no role in statistical evaluation.
Some (most) maladjusted personalities have an egocentrical need (like spoiled children who demand attention) to be the center/focus of whatever the topic is. This is more often than not displayed with an arrogance and a persuation to be ‘Negative’ to the issue at hand, simply to bring attention to themselves. You see this in very young children and AOL Kiddie-chat.
This type of input (opinion) has no value to scientific evaluation.
But 95 Avalon, setting aside my opinion and your sarcasm, would you agree with me that acetone cannot work for some and not for others; either it works or it doesn’t, and for MPG improvement, only a properly designed and controlled bench test can tell us for sure?
‘cannot work for some and not for others’ ??
Are u serious? the first time I thought it was a typographical error.
Now I know your exactly what I said previously,
I just want statistics,
if you don’t have em, WTF u givin me your opinion for?
I got no time to waste on ‘tards’
Nuff said..
what a moron
95 Avalon, from your kind and thoughtful answer, I take it you don’t agree with me. Therefore, you must think acetone can work for some, and not for others. If that’s true, then what would the success criteria be? Acetone works in Fords, but not Honda’s? It works for blonds, but not redheads? It works for smart people, but not ‘tards and morons? Enlighten me, please.
You cry out for “statistics”, but there aren’t any. Why not? Because acetone probably doesn’t work. Don’t you think if there was one shred of valid data proving that acetone improved MPG, every can of acetone would have a label saying so? Do you think the acetone makers would keep it a secret? Ford would provide a year’s supply with every Expedition they sell.
IT WORKS- AND IT HELPS THE ENVIRONMENT !
Exhaust Emissions Test Results
Aug 16: HC grams per Mile = 1.14 last weeks test
Aug 23: HC grams per mile = 0.83 yesterdays test
—-
0.31 grams per mile LESS HC with Acetone
Well, I guess this websights insistance that Acetone doesn’t work or produces less harmful emissions is BUSTED!
I suggest anyone interested in saving money; more miles per gallon,
and helping the environment LEAVE this obnoxious; moronic websight
(do a google search of Acetone in fuel, or More miles per gallon)
THIS SIGHT IS DOMINATED BY MORONS WHO VALUE THEIR OWN OPINION MORE THAN FACTS OR OTHERS ACTUAL EXPERIENCES.
IF YOU WANT REAL INFORMATION, BETTER TO LEAVE HERE AND NOT WASTE YOUR VALUABLE TIME WITH JIBBER-JABBER AND SELF INDULGANT IDIOTS
BUH BYE TARDS!!
From this link at the top of the page, “Reasonable people with reasonable abilities of scientific understanding and interpretation would expect little to no change.”
Wow. What a pretentious thing to say. What knowledge of the average or “reasonable” person has led you to make that statement? Surely your reasonable abilities of scientific understanding should have prevented you from making that statement. Do you mean to say that the average person should have an understanding of chemical engineering?
Typical attitude of a college engineering student. At least you’re not a CE.
Reasonable is not necessarily average. I’d even venture to say that “reasonable” is definitely not average. Hell, a reasonable person with reasonable scientific understanding is relatively rare, almost certainly < 25% of the population. So, no, an average person should not have an understanding of chemical engineering. Of course, the acetone-in-gasoline question isn’t a chemical engineering question, anyway.
PS. I’m not a college engineering student.
I’m no engineer nor was my testing done in a controlled scientific manor. But I do know how to check my gas mileage and after adding 2 oz of 100% acetone per 10 gal of gas in my 86 Porsche 911 turbo, the milage went from 12 mpg to 23 mpg! After four months of use it averages between 8 and 11 mpg increase depending on the gas I used and the way I drove.
The biggest surprise to me was one I didn’t even take into consideration so as not to be confused with the placebo effect, was the increase in performance! I put it in my tank and by the time I got down to the corner I noticed a “big difference” in the way my car was running, smoother and more power.
After telling my sister about it she got a 5 mpg increase in her late model Jeep suv and another friend got a 3 mpg increase in his 2008 GTO with that monster Corvette engine in it. Literally “all” the people I’ve told about using acetone that gave it a try have got an increase of varying degrees, some large some small, but an increase just the same.
So how anyone out there can say acetone doesn’t work or is a waste of your time must be standing to close to the fumes! It works great especially considering the price of gas today! Try it yourself and see…
P.S.
Thank you nobrainer for letting me use your soap box to voice my opinion.
Greatly appreciated my friend. Best of luck.
For people who like conspiracy theories:
1. Why assume people who reject this are the only side with anything to gain? If nothing else he gets money from his website traffic. I made my way to this site jumping from link in which video on acetone was advertised to have won a cash reward for whatever reason. Not backing up with links or facts as I don’t care enough, and a conspiracy theory doesn’t need them.
2. I see a whole lot of testimonials that seem like they’re from the same person going down in different names. I think this because they sound like an ad, they use more exclamation marks than a french canadian, stylisticly the same( PURE acetone!!), all names like Jim, Ted, Bob, etc.
But that is probably my paranoid nature talking.
3. Person selling something ALWAYS has something to gain, even if its an idea. It’s a lot easier to believe that one or a few people are crazy or else have an agenda than that whole industries are covering it up.
I’ll have myself to blame when the paint peels all around my gas cap. I’ll let you know.
I finished an 1171 trip. While I was driving in Texas on I-30 before I started my last long trip, someone dropped a load of red dirt all over the highway. I had to drive thru a man made Texas dust storm. Starting out on my most recent long trip, I noticed that I was only getting 25 MPG with Chevron and BP gasolines. I was getting stressed out because my base line is 29 MPG using using acetone. I have also been checking Fram air filters because they have changed their design on some filters. I was using their newest filter with 6000 miles of use, when I drove thru the man made dust storm. Since the filter material was smaller on the new filter, thought the filter may be restricting the air flow. Changed the new filter back to the old filter that had around 6000 miles of use on it and bingo, back to 29 MPG. So what I learned during my last two long trips is that gasoline and air filters do have a direct impact on the testing results of gasoline using acetone. I mix the acetone with a half gallon of gasoline in a container before I put the acetone in the tank. I do not have any paint peels all around my gas cap. Yes I spill gasoline around the fuel filler
tube sometime and I have not seen any damage to the paint on the body. Of course I wipe off the spill as soon as possible.
You can purchase 100% acetone form Wal-Mart in the nail care section. It is affordable and they sell a brand that has a red top that has a built in nozzle. I have tried the acetone and it worked; a little. I still do not know if it’s me or the acetone.
1996 Nissan 4X$
Ka24E Motor
16 gallon tank
3 oz. per 10 gallons
overall 19 mpg.
after acetone 22 mpg.
If you are not going to use 100% virgin acetone, then you are not using generally accepted practices for getting the best results using acetone. If you don’t change your oil, oil filter, air filters, use a good brand of gasoline and put the right air pressure in your tires, the acetone test will not produce any remarkable results. I have not seen any indication one way or the other that Wal-Mart sells 100% virgin acetone. The container with acetone that Wal-Mart sells doesn’t read 100% acetone.
See this is exactly why I doubt acetone works. It sounds to me like you’re saying to follow these 4 simple steps:
1: establish a baseline
2: Fix everything that’s wrong on your car and ensure that it’s now in top running order.
3: Add some acetone to your tank on top of all the problems you just fixed which were killing your mileage.
4: Come back and tell us how much acetone worked, ignoring all the effects of step 2.
It’s also bothersome because this belies what the claim behind acetone is all about. The claim is that acetone will change and vastly improve the burn characteristics of the fuel-air mixture. What impact is tire pressure going to have on the change in burn characteristics? It’s not! So long as oil, oil filter, air filter, brand of gasoline, and air pressure (i.e. the control variables) don’t change during the test, no matter their state, a good, and otherwise well controlled test should only measure the change due to acetone. So if a test ignores the control variables (i.e. leaves them the way they are), and there aren’t “any remarkable results,” then it’s probably a pretty good sign that acetone isn’t changing a damn thing.
Hey, finally someone who know the history of planes. It was also discovered that the Mitsubishi motors had a lot of aluminum parts, weight issues, and the internal structure was reinforced with, yes, balsa wood. Our planes were a little slower and less maneverable but we also had steel plating for protection so a lot of our pilots came home and did not explode like a fireball.
Yeah nice until a car nails you and you lose a leg, but cooool.
Seriously I have not seen any comments on acetone increasing motorcyle mpg. Does anyone have this.
The comment “The container with acetone that Wal-Mart sells doesn’t read 100% acetone.” should read: The container with acetone that Wal-Mart sells doesn’t read 100% virgin acetone.
Well, y’all; I think I’ve read enough. I’ve researched this item on acetone sufficiently; I’ve read many blogs about increasing mileage and performance; I’ve read (or stumbled) through this thread, many times missing the point about “the point”, and y’all have made me a believer. I’m going to try acetone in my 2005 Neon SLT. I can’t think of a valid reason, but I will post my results here, and join the many folk who have anecdotal proof of a “myth”(?).
Regards
My results: without acetone: 20.10 MPG vs. with acetone: 23.05 MPG.
2003 Honda Pilot (purchased late 2003) 50 KMiles. Driving almost exclusively country roads, some dirt but most paved. No stoplights, 1 stop sign every 4 miles (on average). Speed 35-40 MPH average (less on dirt, more on pavement). Bought 100% acetone at a drug store and added 4 fl. oz. per 12 gallons gasoline. Last 3 (of 4) acetone-added tanksful yielded 23.053 MPG, early Fall, New England. Compared that with 3 no-additive fillups from late Summer, same driving conditions except for A/C. I had A/C running in the summer, so that may have caused some MPG loss vs. fall with no A/C. But a 15% difference? Unlikely.
I don’t think it’s possible to come to a definite conclusion, even in a laboratory setting. Such results would only be valid for a laboratory setting. I think the only way to know if acetone works for you is to try it in your environment. Don’t believe anyone who advocates for or against acetone based solely on mental analysis. It only counts when the rubber meets the road.
An old racer had an adage which I found appropriate to the whole acetone in gasoline debate.
When the reality disagrees with the theory, we throw out the theory. If acetone improves your mpg, then it works Nuff said!
The racer’s adage is correct, and is the same ideal embraced by scientists.
I further agree that if acetone improves your mileage, then it works. The problem however — and this is where people with a science background start to doubt the “reality” of acetone improving mileage — is that most of the people who claim that it worked for them have performed such poor “tests” that they really can’t show whether acetone or something else caused the perceived mileage improvement.
For those who don’t understand such nuance, let me recommend that you read a copy of Bad Science
> performed such poor “tests” that they really can’t show whether acetone or something else caused the perceived mileage improvement.
Absolutely. On the other hand, it is mighty difficult to replicate ALL experimental conditions. For example, I didn’t control humidity, air quality or tire pressure — they were what they were. Anyone sufficiently determined can find fault with test conditions, at least to their satisfaction.
But such uncontrolled factors tend to cancel out over a large enough sample size. Any reasonable observer concerned about say tire pressure would have to rule that out as a factor if they saw the same results from multiple experiments alternating with/without acetone, assuming I am being honest about everything. (If I DON’T want to be honest, hell I could just cook the numbers from day 0).
Continuing the test, I’m now off acetone and will measure the mileage again for a few fillups, then rotate back on, etc. But already, about 100 miles without acetone, the gas needle is a lot farther from “F” than I’m used to seeing when using acetone. ‘Course that’s just anecdotal evidence until I get the numbers from the next fill-up. Look for an update in late December.
One thing I have noticed over the years is that octane affects engines of different displacement differently. I noticed that when I used octane boosters in small engines such as a 1.9L Ford escort the fuel economy jumped dramatically. In a larger engine such as a 350 Windsor, it was not very noticeable. This may explain some of the dramatic differences of results. The main question to ask is what does acetone actually do? Is it changing the octane or is it just cleaning a clogged up piece of junk that was poorly maintained so it runs like it should have?
It may be worth investigating this…..
Acetone Cracked the block in my VW!! Nah, just kidding. I don’t own a ScanGuage but I have noticed an increase from about 19 to 23 Mpg. Also, by adding 2.5 oz per 10 gal. the knocking has quieted and the idle is a bit smoother in additon to my road-head frequency increasing an amazing 33.3 %! (Prob. not due to the acetone, but I’ll keep useing it just incase).
Acetone works.
Experiment. See for yourself.
You could work on late night television and be a hit. What impact is tire pressure going to have on the change in burn characteristics? It’s not! Where did I say tire pressure affects the burn characteristics? I didn’t. One goal of having a baseline is to eliminate as many variables as possible. I performed my tests with the goal of improving gas mileage, not to evaluate how clean my spark plugs looked after 10,000 miles. That is an idea for later testing. If the temperature changes, so will the air pressure in the tires. The change in temperature will change the burn characteristics of gasoline. I am not funded by the federal government with grants, so I did not make these tests, If you remember riding a bicycle, when the tires were low you had to pedal harder, thus more ENERGY was used to go the same distance. When the tire had high pressure, less ENERGY was required to go the same distance. Keeping the tire pressure constant, is a componet of the acetone in gasoline test, that cannot vary. If tire pressure is not constant, the results will be skewed and real research doesn’t happen. Lowering the tire pressure will use more ENERGY and thus more gasoline. New vehicles are designed to operate at a pre-determined way. Poorly maintained vehicles will run differently and will throw more variables into the tests. We don’t know how the other variables induced into the test by a poorly maintained vehicle, will actually the change the test results, unless we spend a great amount of time and effort controlling for these possible confounds. What you consider remarkable is your opinion. When gasoline was $4.00 a gallon and I gained 100 miles per tank using acetone, it was a “NO BRAINER” that acetone used in gasoline saves me money.
The base argument in favor of acetone is that it improves the fuel burn characteristics which in turn improves the thermal efficiency of the engine which in turn improves mileage. Therefore if acetone works as claimed, it should work regardless of tire pressure, so long as the testing is done with consistent pressures.
The point I was trying to make in the comment I think you were replying to, is that it seems like a lot of people who say that acetone works a) establish a baseline (generally badly), b) change of bunch of stuff on their cars from filters to tires to tire pressures to reducing the weight, d) adding some acetone, e) reporting the results, without any regard at all for step c) establish new baseline to account for changes to the vehicle.
Yes nobrainer,I agree, if acetone works as claimed, engine performance will be maintained to a point. I think depending on the design of engine and transmission, if the tire pressure is so low and the load rating of the engine is way over loaded, the over loading may affect engine performance along with the benefits of using acetone. I have never conducted trailer/boat pulling up hills on 15 lb. PSI tires with a small engine. However, if tire pressure has changed, then the baseline has been altered and a new set of tests must be conducted to determine by what amount acetone improves gas milage. Just because a certain load on engine output may allow a 5% performance boost using acetone, doesn’t necessarily mean that increasing the load on an engine by 30%, will necessarily allow acetone to continue to provide a 5% performance boost, because the design of the whole power system must be considered. So your comment, “Therefore if acetone works as claimed, it should work regardless of tire pressure, so long as the testing is done with consistent pressures,” does hold some truth. But since the whole power system is involved, not just the engine, your premise is not necessarily logical or will produce an inevitable conclusion. Even many highly paid scientists fall into this exact same trap while conducting research. The transmission cannot be excluded in this case and the results may not be what you expect. My last two extended gas milage performance tests were directly affected by tire pressure, brand/type of gasoline, with or without the use of acetone and air filters. Since the outside temps of 55-98F did not result in an increase or decrease of gas milage during the last two trips, I determined the engine design and summer gas formula took care of this range of differences with the outside temps, during the time I conducted my tests. Carrying 4 adult passengers will drop gas milage performance. Carrying 4 adult passengers dropped my gas milage using acetone to 21 MPG on the highway. Since I do not carry passengers to earn an income, I did not perform extensive tests to determine where the optimum weight trade off begins, to limit the weight in relation to getting good gas milage performance using acetone. During my next extemded tests using acetone, I plan to check the gas milage performance differences with low rolling resistance tires. Tire pressure tracking again will be will be included in my baseline. Have you looked into the difference of air filters? Since you have addressed the issue of fuel burn characteristics and since air flow directly affects the fuel burn characteristics of gasoline. I would think that would be something of interest to you. If meaningful parameters are included in a baseline, the research can be very useful. I doubt the majority of research projects conducted in the United States by so called scientists, have all the critical elements in a baseline when a research project is first started. Global scientists are a good example. Does my baseline have room for improvement? Yes it does. Since I am the Simple Man, I have kept my baseline simple. Tire pressure, air filters, brand and type of gasoline, ratio of acetone to gasoline, temperature, cargo weight and vehicle surface cleanliness. All of these elements help get better gas milage and are addressed on various web sites. Since I was able to resolve my air filter problem quickly w/o additional test equipment, I am convinced my baseline is productive and effective. As I continue to add other elements into my baseline, I expect to learn more.
1 ounce to ten gallons has been neting me 4 to6 miles per gallon more for the last 6 months and NO PROBLEMS!!!
All the ppl who think acetone is a myth are fools!!! I added 1 tsp of acetone to my gas tank and my Suburban got 300 MPG!!! I thought to myself… why use gas at all. I have been running on pure acetone for 20 years now with no problem. I only fill up my tank about twice a year and can go go about 30,000 miles on a full tank!
I don’t quite see the conflict here guys. If acetone works for you then use it. If not, well, don’t! I think all of you who try to argue either case with big words create the propaganda. For all I know it doesn’t hurt trying but I definitely WON’T buy a scangauge, for sure! If the result is so great I should be able to ascertain that without any sophisticated equipment.
In the end, talking BS at each other won’t really help anyone and actions are always better than talk. So, instead of sitting in your couch watching Mythbusters and praising them how great they are, maybe you should go out and try to do something yourself and prove something for yourself! Eeeh, that may never happen, but hey, who knows…
wow, had no idea there was such a debate on the issue. it’s really hard to imagine that people have so much time on their hands to argue such moot points. as was said, if you want to know if it works, do it. i was a little scared but intrigued at the same time, so i tried it first in my old diesel truck, and with no ill effect moved on to my ‘02 honda civic. i saw little to no effect in the truck, but saw sigificant gains in the honda. while i used no scientific testing, my in town mileage jumped (after several tanks) to the high 30’s. but i ran out of acetone and stopped . . . oh well. i do agree that the old man (whatever his name is) is a bit of a quack. all his milegae claims were at 45-50 mph. anybody is going to improve their mileage if they drive that slow, my jetta tdi got 48.3 mpg at 70 mph but 44 mpg @ 75 mph, but i’ve heard of people getting 60-65 mpg out of them. if we all slow down a bit we could really save some money, it really suprises me how many people FLY on the highway.
any thoughts on hydrogen?
So when the japs flew their plywood planes into our carriers and battleships,they just went “poof” and turned to dust?..id like you to explain that to admiral halsey…only their fuel tanks were plywood mr internet genius.
So when the japs flew their plywood planes into our carriers and battleships,they just went “poof” and turned to dust?..id like you to explain that to admiral halsey…only their fuel tanks were plywood mr internet genius.
I use an ounce of acetone in each tank of gas in my Hillman Minx which I don’t think has fuel “injectors”. It used to get 25 miles per gallon and now gets 30. What about that Mr. Science or should I say Chevron zombie.
Oil companies obviously brainwashed or payed off all the “scientists” so they wouldn’t let this secret out. If there is one thing sure about scientists, it is that they are greedy bastards and would sell you 15 minutes in the woodshed with their grandmother if you were buying. What do you really think a “scientist” would do if they discovered a miracle secret to greater fuel milage, write a paper about it, get into any post doc program in the country, no of course they would call shell and ask for hush money.
I know of several other additives that will improve your mileage even more than acetone will, and while I use them myself in my Renault Dauphine, I am under contract from uncle sam and the trilateral commission not to mention them in a public forum or do and sience on them. Sorry.
Full disclosure, I also run a hydrogen generator on the car powered by a windmill on the roof which, while apearently defying the laws of physics, actually boosts my milage 16.7543% on average. Of course the Fisher rays eminating from the generator have to be delt with, but I use a tin foil covering on my cranial ceryoplexum to deflect them to safer stratisfurigamica counsling the friferen an Joe.
clepsoflazem,
yorerjiumn
Has any body tried TNT on their ignition system? once you try it no more need for gasoline or acetone or this debate.
can someone tell me if it works? ive been debating on whether to use it or not for like two years.
i just put 2 ounces in my jetta 2 day i will post results soon.i normally get about 431 miles out of a tank on long trips from a 14.5 gallon tank using chevron gas. c u guys later
I have been using Acetone as a fuel additive for over a year now. I have found it to provide me with 10% increased fuel milage, smoother running engine and lower idle speed, not to mention there is no longer that black smudge in my exhaust pipe!
Actually, ONCE, I’m guessing due to having hit a “sweet spot” based on ideal gasoline, environmental temperatures, humidity and the perfect amount of acetone, I got a 50% increase in mileage!
Acetone added to gasoline in the right amounts DOES help gas mileage, idle speed and running a cleaner engine!
Mythbusters are among the most Biased Government Whitewashers on the internet.
COLD FUSION WORKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
and dont forget!
ACETONE WORKS!!!
“Chevron controls the worldwide patent rights for NIMH batteries used in the RAV4-EV, and won’t allow their use in EVs.”
source: http://www.ev1.org/chevron.htm
Your source contradicts itself.
Chevron “refuses to sell their version of the battery unless, they say, they get ‘a large OEM order’.”
I am starting to use 3 oz acetone per 10 gals of gas in my 98 Dodge 1500 and will report anything. Usually get 13 mpg just driving to and from work.
I put 1 ounce of accetone for 10 gallons of gas ans mileage went from 15.50 to 18.47 in the city I have not done any hwy driving yet. this is a 2997 gmc acadia. The book says 17 city and 24 hwy. Since I got this car I have been getting only 15 but i am getting 26 on the hwy. Hoping to get 20 city and 30 highway after testing with accetone
Dave is visiting us… FROM THE FUTURE!
That Acadia is nice, but I hear the 3000 model year’s retro thrusters will be 35% more efficient and its powerplant is +2.3GigaHorsepower more powerful.
Sweet.
Ho, Ho, Ho. Good joke, D.S. If you don’t have anything intelligent to say, just keep your yap shut and go back to Facebook, etc. Read some of my postings on Allpar dot com, Tech Forums.
volunteer:
As soon as [edit]Nobrainer[/edit] asks me to recuse myself, I’ll do so. Until such point, I’ll thank you to mind your own business.
Take your sanctimony back to Allpar, where apparently people actually care for your opinions.
Bought a 1993 Ford Fiesta with 62K on the ODO back in July, 2005. Knew it would get great mileage as-is and be indestructible for my sons to learn how to drive a manual. I immediately began bragging about the mileage as gas prices rose, all the while tracking every penny, drop of fluid, and mile covered very diligently. After having a full calendar year’s worth of data covering my regular commute with only rare exceptions for those teaching lessons and odd errands, I came across the claims of the acetone. Since the car is consitently maintained, and fuel injector cleaners were used when I first purchased it, anyway, it looked like a great candidate. 10 gallon tank, easy to measure.
Bottom line: For $0.24 worth of Acetone added per tank, I get 45-60 more miles out of each of those tanks; more than 10% improvement regardless of my driving style!
33mpg driving like a maniac on gas, 37.5mpg like a maniac w/acetone!
When plotted throughout the year, the difference in mileage tracks parallel to the weather, it is naturally worse in the middle of winter. Both values, with and without acetone, each tracked parallel to the weather changes, the one with acetone was just always higher. This has remained consistent to this day. When one variable would change (new tires) the values changed a little, at that point, but the difference always remained. The effect remains to this day, if I forget to put it in or don’t have my supply replenished, I’m back down to 350ish on a tank. If it is in the tank, @ 350, I still have an 1/8th of a tank to go.
ODO is now @ 202580, no fuel issues; just add gas, check air, change oil, replace tires and brakes as needed. If $0.25 of acetone saved you over a gallon’s worth of gas mileage, wouldn’t you at least try it? My coworker thinks I’m nuts, he showed me the top of this page to prove it. I’ll be bringing in the spreadsheet and showing him how the acetone difference actually paid for my car.

this guy is a fraud. I believe he is trying to sell his fogwarmer. He isn’t even close to being an engineer. The only thing he knows about cars is being a shadetree mechanic. None of his car facts even add up.
Well, I don’t know about mileage, but in my ‘83 ford LTD wagon it sure smooths out the rough idle while warming up. I don’t drive it much, just under a mile to work and back when it is raining or cold and I don’t want to walk, so mileage is not the issue for me. I just hate having my engine stall a a few blocks between work and home. A few cents of acetone fixed what repeated trips to a mechanic could not. Worth it for me.
Unbelieveable that there is still doubt that acetone will increase mileage…
As for Mythbusters - hate to say it, but this program is aimed at low-IQ, uneducated plebs! Also, they are only too happy to act as disinformation agents for bigoil when called upon - acetone value being a prime example. Another was the Bedini motor - although this has been already been duplicated and verified every bit as much as acetone, and even though those idiots had some MIT physicist (the same people that ‘proved’ “cold fusion” was bogus - despite the Pons/Fleishmann discovery having now been replicated 100’s of times, and MIT shown to have fraudiently tampered with the data at the time)’guiding’ them in the motors construction - IT DIDN’T EVEN HAVE MAGNETS FITTED!!! btw, the SG motor (schoolgirl - ‘cos a schoolgirl had built it with Bedini’s help) was making headlines at the time, so Mythbusters were called on to undermine it…
You have a very strange definition of the word “unbelievable.”
Trouble spelling also….”fraudiently”?????
Dazzle me some more brainiac.
fuck u
You are right about myth busters. they are for idiots. Did you see the one about the moon missions. do you really think they would have had nasa’s help to prove we didn’t go to the moon. check into it. the myth busters are propaganda bs artists paid for by the government.
And you are delusional.