10/30/2006

For the UVA football fans
Filed under: Sports, General — nobrainer @ 12:14 am

I was looking over some football stats, trying to determine which ACC school has the greatest home field advantage. Based on my reasoning, UVA enjoys that position.

For ACC teams with their current head coaches, I compared winning percentages at home and on the road both for all games and just for league games. And under Coach Groh, the Cavs are more than twice as likely to win at home as on the road. That means that Scott Stadium is truly one of the underappreciated home fields, or Al Groh is extremely bad at motivating his tropps on the road.

collapse Mr. Bingley Says:

Hmmm, I wonder how of that is a higher percentage of pattsies being scheduled for home games? Non-league, of course.

collapse nobrainer Says:

in 2001 there were 3 home games: Richmond, Penn State, and Virginia Tech — all wins

in 2002 South Carolina and Akron were beaten at home, and there were losses to VT and Penn State on the road.

In 2003, Troy State and VT were beaten at home. Western Michigan was a road win, and South Carolina was a road loss.

In 2004, the patsies showed up. Akron and Syracuse were home wins, Temple was a road win.

In 2005, Temple and W Michigan were home wins, while Syracuse was a road win.

In 2006, Pitt and ECU were road losses. Wyoming was a home win and W Michigan was a home loss.

 
 
collapse Mr. Bingley Says:

Ah, so maybe there is something special about “the good olde song” after all…

I’m just pissed they’ve spent millions upon millions upon millions of dollars to go from 2-10 to 6-5.

collapse nobrainer Says:

I’m sure it’s going to take a lot more money to buy 10-win seasons.

It could [UNC] be [NC State] worse [Duke] though.

 
 
collapse Wha Says:

I like how these arguments work. They aren’t necessarily the best on the road or at home, they just give up a lot more production (wins) by going on the road vs staying at home, therefore they have the competitive advantage at home. Econ theory is fun!